Anti-gravity. Well isn't that extra-special?

what you guys are talking about is a gravity-propulsion device an anti-gravity device would just make the thing immune to gravity.
anyways something like that would be more probable in my opinion. if something was immune to gravity it would just slowly float upwards from the earths surface at an angle to its point of departure. why? because the earth orbits the sun and the earth rotates.

I hope one of you knows what im talking about and explains it better.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Do you have any information regarding formidable attempts to create antigravitational devices have been recorded. Or better still any devices or information sold to companies, and/or government institutions?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

My point is that instead of looking for antimatter to anhilate matter,that is to say gravitons anhilated by antigravitons,why not produce antimatter from the matter itself and then anhilate the antimatter for propulsion.

take for instance,photons,
as JAMES R has mentioned in one of his threads that photon is an antiparticle of itself,so why not study the antiparticle state of the photon and positrons and their various charracterstics behaviour which differentiate from their counterparts,including opposite charges etc.that would reduce the costs considerably.
anyways,it is still not proved that gravitons do exist,but if they do,then we have find them out or isolate them fast.a big problem here is that gravitons are supposed to transparent to matter.
any inputs in this regard will be welcome.
bye!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Fundamental Constant?

I believe I once read an article on a new type of force being researched by Physicists (they come up with new ones too often for my liking!!) that was described as a sort of universal anti-gravity. It was hypothesized that this force is what kept the universe from reshrinking a la big crunch. I was not too clear on what exactly propogated this force. Regular matter exhibits gravitational attraction, but what exactly caused the antigravity I can't say, though I believe it was some kind of particle that interacts weakly with regular matter. Either way, this research had given way to a new fundamental constant that the physicists denoted with lambda... so if you see a lambda that doesn't represent wavelength or mean free path of a particle, it may be just what I'm so unsuccessfully trying to explain.

Hypothetically, if we could pin down this 'repulsive' substance, could it not be used in practical applications of anti-gravity? I'm not talking UFO's or floating skateboards here, either.... with a strong enough anti-gravity device, could we not peer inside the event horizon of a black hole and then come back out?? Interesting thought, no?

 

I guess antigravity can be produced with a bunch of spinning discs. The theory would almost be identical to the "right angle" theory of electric and magnetic fields. Example:

When an electron moves in a straight line it produces a magnetic field at right angles to both the electric field of the electron and the motion of the electron. Now that you have a magnetic field, you can convert it back to an electric field using the same technique. The resulting electric field can be bipolar even though the original electric field of the electrons were unipolar.

Here's my idea:

When a particle, with a mass, moves in a straight line it produces a Z-field at right angles to both the gravitational field and the motion of the mass(gyroscopic effect in revolving objects). Now that you have a Z-field, you can convert it to a bipolar gravitational field using the same technique. Since the gravitational field created is bipolar, one pole is gravity, the other is antigravity. You can figure out the rest.

Tom

 

"Eerily, every electrical circuit and every electrical load is - and has always been - powered by EM energy extracted directly from the vacuum.......

"Broken symmetry in the fierce exchange between the active vacuum and the system
powers every system they build. And not a single professor or university teaches that,
nor does it appear in a single textbook......



"All the coal, oil, natural gas, etc. ever burned, and all the nuclear fuel rods ever used, and all the hydroelectric dams ever built, have directly added

not one single watt

to the power line. Not one!"

...in the interests of science it is necessary over and over again to engage in the critique of these fundamental concepts, in order that we may not unconsciously be ruled by them."

 

Field effect

What about counter rotating fields along with high frequency energy in capacitor series, is anyone here tech?

 

James R,

A Z-field is the sister of the gravitational field just like the magnetic field is the sister of the electric field. I call it the Z-field because it hasn't been named yet. If you want to see it in action, spin a top.

Tom

 

what is mathematic formula for anti-gravity?

Gravity force is formulated as:

F = (Gm1m2)/r^2

F is gravitation force
G is a constant
m1 and m2 are mass
and r is distance.

Anti gravity mean minus (-) F. The result of the formula will always posistive, unless we have negative value of m or r.
But how distance become negative?
How mass become negative?

 

James R,

If you attempt to push a spinning top over, it will not fall down. Instead it will generate a force at a right angle to your force. This will cause the top to precess instead of fall over. What happened is that when you attempted to push the top over, the Z-Force got converted back into a gravitational force as explained in the previous post.

When you spin a top:

gravitational field + motion(at a right angle to gravitational field) =
Z-Force(at a right angle to both gravitational field and motion)

So in a spinning top the Z-force is created pointing upwards. When you attempt to move the Z-force then:

Z-Force + motion(at a right angle to the Z_Force)=
gravitational field(at a right angle to both the Z-Force and motion)

This gravitational force just created is at right angles to the Z-Force(created by the spinning top) and motion(you pushing the top).This gravitational field causes the top to precess.

Tom

 

SISgroup,

If I gave you a few million electrons and told you to make a positive electric field could you do it? It can be done, but only through electric/magnetic conversion. You would move the electrons to create a magnetic field, then you would move the magnetic field(or alter it's strength) to generate a bipolar electric field. In other words, you just created an anti-electric field(positive electric field) even though you didn't have any protons.

This is exactly what I'm suggesting, only with mass instead of electrons.

Tom

 

negative electric force (electron) is opposite of opposite of positive electric force (proton). And yes you right.
Then, to create the anti-gravitation force, we need the opposite of gravitation force.
So, what is the opposite of gravitation force?

 

James R,

I'm sure you can. I am also familiar with the formula, but in the science textbooks they never give a good explanation why this 90 degree force exists. The usual explanation is that there is a delay, so that the force is transferred after the top makes a 90 degree spin. This reason is flawed because the force is ALWAYS at 90 degrees to the original force. If this explanation was correct then the degrees would vary based on how fast the top would be spinning. Unfortunately, this is not the case.

If you know of another explanation for this force, please share.

Tom

 

SISGroup,

It's more like this:

Proton(positive electric field)+ motion=Magnetic field

Magnetic field + motion= Dipolar electric field(electric and anti-electric field)

Therefore:

Mass(positive gravitational field) + motion= Z-force

Z-force + motion = Dipolar gravitational(gravity and anti-gravity)



Tom

 

Mass + motion = sound like kinetic energy.

Proton has energy to pull the electron, but cannot 'touch' the electron.
And a mass has energy to pull anything, also can make touchings.
Proton has two energy, first is positive electric and second in gravity of it mass. So the right 'formula' of magnetic field may:

protons (or electrons) + gravity + motion = magnetic field.
Is there a third variable in Z force formula?

 

James R,

It still doesn't explain why the new force is ALWAYS at a 90 degree angle to the original force. According to your explanation, the angle of the secondary force should vary.

Tom