Anti-gravity. Well isn't that extra-special?


Gravity isn't in the formula for electric/magnetic conversion. The strength of the resulting magnetic field is the result of only two factors: The strength of the electric field, and the speed of the field(or the speed at which it changes).


Try this explanation in terms of forces if you have trouble understanding my previous explanation:

Imagine holding a bicycle wheel by its axle. Each hand is on one side of the wheel, and the wheel is spinning so that the top is moving away from you and the bottom is moving towards you. Now, suppose you want to turn the wheel so that the axle is still horizontal but the left side is closer to your body than the ride side. What force do you need to apply?

Common sense will tell you that you need to push forwards with your right hand and pull back with your left hand. But your knowledge of precession (and the experiment, if you do it) will tell you that is wrong. What you actually need to do is push upwards with your right hand and down with your left - then the wheel will move around at right angles to the applied force. Here's the explanation:

Consider a point at the top of the wheel. Instantaneously, it is moving away from you. What you want it to do is to move more to the left. Looking at the point at the bottom of the wheel, you want it to move around to the right a bit (remember it is moving towards you). Extending this type of reasoning, we can tell that all points on the top half of the wheel need to move to the left, and all points on the bottom half need to move to the right. The only way to change the velocity of any part of the wheel in a certain direction is to apply a force in that direction. To apply the right kind of force here you need to push your left hand down and right hand up, then the wheel turns to the left.

The explanation for the top is very similar to this. The explanation with torques explains the same facts in a different way. Either way, no z-force is needed.
Yes, you right.
The formula for magnetic field not consist of mass of electron.

But, I still cannot understand, how motion of positive mass produce Z-field. (I'm sorry, I 'jump' from my basic question)

Motion of positive mass will have kinetic energy. And yes, kinetic energy makes a positive cannot be pulled by gravity. This is like moon and earth. Earth cannot pull the moon since velocity of moon is strong enough against gravity of earth. No Z force acting on this phenomenon, i think.

BTW, If movement of positive mass create Z-field, therefore our earth will be influenced by Z-force of moon. Can you prove that there is a Z-field caused by moon on the earth?

There is no Z-force influence on the earth by the moon. This is why:

1. The Z-force created from a spinning object is at right angles to the spin of the object and at right angles to it's gravitational field. So only the gradient of the gravitational field in the X and Y axis of the Earth is being converted to the Z-force. The resulting Z-force forms only at the Z axis of the Earth. In other words, the Z-force created, is exiting at the north and south poles of the Earth.

Since the same applies to the moon, you can see that the Earths and the moons Z-forces do not intersect. Therefore, their Z-forces do not influence each other.

2. The Z-force is a weak force(as weak as gravity). In order to generate a powerful Z-force, you need to either spin a very heavy mass, or a smaller mass very quickly. The Earth does not spin fast enough to create a significant Z-force.

Originally posted by Joeblow93132
.... The Earth does not spin fast enough to create a significant Z-force.


If your hypothesis is true then it is testable for even if it generated an extremely small force, over time that force would impact the orbitals of circumpolar satellites to such an extent that major course corrections would be needed.

I do not believe that that is the case for any circumpolar satellite that I am aware of.

Interesting. I'll have to think about that.


When the satellites go over the northern pole, Z-force may pull the satellites toward earth, but when they cross the southern pole, the opposite Z-force pushes them back to their original orbit.
At either point, the difference between the original orbit and the forced orbit would probably be under one meter.

James R,

I read your article about the spinning wheel a couple of times, but I still don't understand your explanation. How do you explain the fact the secondary force is always at a 90 degree angle to the primary force, never more or less? According to your explanation, shouldn't the angle be less than 90 degrees if the wheel spins slower and more if the wheel spins faster?


It's a simple matter of changing the velocity of points on the wheel. If you want to add a velocity component in a particular direction, you need to apply a force in that direction. That's all there is to it.
Originally posted by Joeblow93132

When the satellites go over the northern pole, Z-force may pull the satellites toward earth, but when they cross the southern pole, the opposite Z-force pushes them back to their original orbit.
At either point, the difference between the original orbit and the forced orbit would probably be under one meter.


But this would imply that there is total symmetry between the polor components of the Z force. Because the distribution of mass in the earth is not symmetrical, and because the earth is rotating, the Z force and its vector/magnitude at the north pole will be different from the Z force at the south pole at some given point in time after the satellite crosses the north pole. Remember, the satellite takes some finite amount of time to traverse from the north pole to the south, therefore the vector/magnitude of the Z force would have changed and there would not be a symmetry of forces to cancel each other out.

If the distribution of mass on Earth is not symmetrical, why aren't satellites pulled out of their orbits when they pass over a mountain?

The fact is that it doesn't matter if the mass of the Earth is symmetrical or not. Only when you take a fragment of a satellites orbit does symmetry matter, when you take the entire orbit of the satellite into consideration it no longer matters because all the forces balance out. The same applies to the Z-force, at some points around the Earth, the push and pull of the Z-force will have different strengths. But once the satellite makes a complete orbit the total pull forces of the Z-force will be equal to all the push forces of the Z-force, thereby putting the satellite back into it's original orbit. This will always be the case as long as the satellite's orbit dissects the center of the Earth.

Equator area has longer distance with spining axis of earth than pole area. So, equator area has bigger centrifugal force than pole area. Since direction of centrifugal force is opposite of gravitation force, therefore it can decrease the gravitation force. So, both earth poles is not excited by Z force.
SeekerOfTruth has told us that mass of earth is not symetrical. I thing the north area has bigger mass than south one, because most continents lies in north area. So, the center of earth's mass should be closer with north ole then south one.
According to formula of gravitation force, therefore north pole will have different number of gravitation force than south one.
Last edited:
Hi tomtomberry ...

Welcome to Sciforums.

Might want to check out this site:

<a href=> <font color=red> Anti-Gravity Machine </font> </a>

Take care ;)
<Img Src=>
It's True! Antigravitics, ZPE, Teleportation and Time~Travel are all connected by a series of Quantum Particles and will be proven in public demonstrations very soon! it's only "A Matter of Time"

---T12 of TAP-TEN

<Img Src=>

From our Bookmarks section:
---Antigravity Research
A collection of anti-grav research links...

*A Compilation of Anti-Gravity Articles And References
With apologies for not fixing the equations or symbols. Someone send me the replacement text, and I will fix it! These 5 articles are included in this file below...

Delta UFO, " The Descent", ©1996, 1997, Dave Kauble. posted on Deb's UFO Research Information Clearinghouse, January 12, 1997 ...

It sounds like something from The X-Files, but levitation is raising eyebrows--and interest at NASA

*Antgrav Research Links2
The Parr Gravity Wheel Experiment, The Gravity Wheel, Gravity Car Proposal, Single Pole Generator The Bedini Hamel Magnetic gate, means of propulsion for a flying disk UFO, An examination of the energy machine of Joseph Newman, Method and apparratus for accumulating electrical energy and transforming ether electricity, Structural Shape and Design of a UFO, Making a wimshurst electro static generator, Electrical Current Generator including Torque Reducing Countermagnetic Field, Sonic Levitation, High Frequency generator, Apparatus for transmission of electrical energy, The Hubbard Energy Transformer by Gaston Burridge, A motor operated by radio waves, Some Improvement in the construction of electro magnets, Hydrogen Fuel generator, Marko Rodin's on his unusual coil design, An Ion electrical generator, Your Car can run on water using this device without pollution, Making your own electrostatic machine, Water Powered Motors, FREE - GEET Multi-Fuel Conversion Plans updated, Very detailed Indian Research Paper on some perpetual motion observations, Extracting Energy from a Permanent Magnet with Energy-Replenishing from the Active Vacuum...

*Anti-Gravity And The Unified Field; Childress, David H. (Ed.); 0932813100; @ Insight
Books by Childress, David H. (Ed.) at Insight Metaphysical Bookstore. We have a wide selection of books on , , . Anti-Gravity And The Unified Field; Childress, ...

*Anti-Gravity Links

*Anti-Gravity Machine (Eugene Podkletnov)
Henry P. Dart, III From: NEN, Vol. 4, No. 7, November 1996, pp. 7-8. New Energy News (NEN) copyright 1996 by Fusion Information Center, Inc. COPYING NOT ALLOWED without written permission. ALL ...

*AntiGravity Article From: "Scientific American"
(By: Mark Connolly) I have recently heard reports of a researcher claiming to have produced anti-gravity effects using a spinning, superconducting disk. Is there any theoretical basis to support the existence of anti-gravity or of some method of shielding out gravity?

*Antigravity News And Space Drive Technology
A new bi-monthly newsletter (began in July 1997) that focuses on the theory, devices, and results of anti-gravity research. A serious publication.

*Antigravity News And Space Drive Technology
Courtesy of the Editor From: NEN, Vol. 5, No. 8, Dec. 1997, pp. 8-9. New Energy News (NEN) copyright 1997 by Fusion Information Center, Inc. COPYING NOT ALLOWED without written permission. ALL ...

*Antigravity and Propelantless propulsion researches
created on March 31th, 2001 - JLN Labs - Last update April 8th, 2001

*BAe's anti-gravity research, By: James Meek, science correspondent
BAe's anti-gravity research braves X-Files ridicule, Serious Progress Hinted In Secret Anti-Gravity Projects . The military wing of the hi-tech conglomerate BAe Systems took the Podkletnov experiment so seriously that it has launched an anti-gravity research programme, Project Greenglow. If the technology could be made to work it would make existing forms of transport obsolete.,3604,183636,00.html

Welcome To The Search For Free-Energy & Anti-Gravity at C.T.G Research Labs, The purpose of this site is to promote knowledge about free-energy and anti-gravity devices and to get other people interested in this rapidly developing field. We hope that presenting our research on the Internet will inspire new ideas in others, it also ensures that information cannot be suppressed, since once it's on the Internet it's out forever.

*Higgs Fields
SCALAR Anti-Grav Device? Higgs technology deals with manipulation of the Higgs scalar field and related forces within the Standard Model of particle physics. All particles get their mass from the interaction between ...

*How To Build A Gravity Car! (Antigravity?)
Introduction: Last summer I published my 5th book, "Shape Power", which describes in detail the experiments which Joe Parr and myself have been doing. The simpler experiments we term the "Gravity Wheel Experiment". Joe discovered the basic effects and perfected the instrumentation. I was interested enough to hop on the band wagon and duplicate the simpler aspect of the experiments. The results from these experiments showed that we can...

*Project Greenglow
BAE SYSTEMS (The company formed from the merger of British Aerospace and Marconi Electronic Systems) is currently running a speculative research programme in the realm of gravitational physics with the aim of initiating some new areas of research and priming technology development, with the hope that subsequent implementation, could lead to significant advances in the aerospace industry. For historical reasons we have called this programme project Greenglow.

Pictured above this design appeared in a crop of wheat at Barbury Castle in 1991. To explore the uniqueness of the design a three dimensional six foot model was constructed. Experiments performed on the model revealed several anomalous properties. This web site is an assemblage of these experiments. ZPF and resonance is dealt with in parts to enlighten the reader to the scientific possibility of inertia modification. This web site is provided as a public service for educational purposes only...Professor Aquino clearly and concisely shows that Inertial Mass and Gravitational mass are related by a energy factor. Controlling this factor, gravitational forces can be reduced, nullified and inverted. No fundamental conservation laws are broken as energy is added to effect the process.

*The Black-Triangle E-Group
We Are Unique - In That We Link Military Aviation ('Spotters') & Mil-Airband (Radio-Scanner) Enthusiasts, With UFO Researchers & The Groom Lake / Area51 'Interceptors'. We Are Searching For Answers To The Many Questions Raised By Sightings Reports Of Triangular, Stealthy & Unknown Flying Craft.

*The Gravitational Spacecraft from Fran De Aquino
Warping to the deep space...created on March 21th, 2000 - JLN Labs - Last update April 20th, 2000 (CAD Photos included)

*The Gravity Shielding Experiment: from "Chris Hardeman"
created on February 4th, 2001 - JLN Labs - February 26th, 2001 ...All informations in this page are published free and are intended for private/educational purposes and not for commercial applications.

*The Rise and Fall of the "Anti-Gravity Machine"
By: D. Trull

*The Thomas Townsend Brown Early Warped Ideas
Early Warped Ideas By Dan McCosh (04,2001)...The man who would later invent the flying saucer was a student at Caltech in 1923, when he first began espousing his theory of gravitation. But the world of conventional physics wasn't quite ready for the ideas of Thomas Townsend Brown, who told his classmates that gravity was a positive force that permeates space, a force that could be directed by high-voltage electricity. At a time when rocket science itself was in its infancy, he speculated that this could be the basis of an interstellar space drive free of the limitations of conventional rockets. It didn't help when the popular press of the day quickly embraced his ideas, while the establishment at Caltech ridiculed them.

*The Thomas Townsend Brown Website
Thomas Townsend Brown, an American physicist, was a leader in developing theories concerning the link between electromagnetic and gravitational fields theorized by Dr. Albert Einstein. He advanced from theory to application with the development of solid and disc-shaped apparatuses which are believed to have created and utilized temporary, localized gravitational fields.

Did you say antigravity? In the Star Wars galaxy, vehicles levitate freely, oblivious to the law of gravity. Some are propelled by reactors that generate a stream of charged particles. All fine to feed our hunger for movie-screen adventures, but in the science community, such antigravity machines aren't just seen as fodder for space fantasies, the mere mention of them is enough to end a scientist's career. In 1992, Eugene Podkletnov, a Russian materials scientist at the University of Tampere in Finland, made a strange observation. Podkletnov was studying superconductors, materials that lose all of their electrical resistance and repel magnetic fields when cooled. While testing a superconducting disc by rotating it above powerful electromagnets, he found that small objects above the disc seemed to lose weight – up to two per cent. It doesn't sound like much, but it would imply that the objects were somehow being shielded from the pull of the Earth.

<Img Src=>