Anyone really good at maths and knows this calculation?

Just because you didn't understand it doesn't mean it wasn't provided, tc.

And your understanding of time is below par.

ETA: Can this thread be moved to pseudo? It's free thought i guess, but it peddles pseudo.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I understand time better than all of you, it is not hard to consider every single aspect of time including your own ideas of time and logically assess all the aspects and consider the truth from the collateral damage of humanities interference.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Such Dunning-Kruger, much wow.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Call it what you will, it is not me in denial of the truths.

 

Do you know the black background of space , beyond the stars is actually more probable well lit, and just simply the light and light emitting sources are beyond our perspective vanishing point of sight so we just see blackness.

 

Gibberish. You can't just make shit up and expect people to go wow.

 

Well, time to quit wasting time on the fools errand of trying to converse logically with TC. Got to get some work done. Have a great day.

 

It is not gibberish , the expanding matter into the universe is expanding beyond our visual perspective vanishing point, the matter does not vanish, a star will light up an area of space but unseen to us because it is simply to far way, beyond the stars there could be lots of matter in expansion already left our visual perspective vanishing point view.
My pebble in a pond method analogy model shows you this.

This can be demonstrated like quite a lot of what I have said.

 

If we ran an electric cable through a container that was filled with a fluid , would the electro motive force around the cable have the magnitude to rotate the fluid like a maelstrom?

 

Cesspool seems more reasonable than pseudo now.

 

And the sooner the better.