Are all dissenting voices cranky ?

Well they're evidence of something, so what do you think they're evidence of? You keep pretending to be an expert, so let's hear your "expert" opinion.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I don't share your confidence Alex.
While there are isolated parts of cosmology that different folk may not be attracted to in the first instant, may be a reasonable scenario, to have some one totally against all of it, from doubt and questions on our unitary stellar system, to orbiting the galactic center, and onto refusal to accept the near certain aspects that GR presents including BH's, and then wallowing in the cesspool and claiming that reputable notable experiments such as GP-B, and aLIGO are fraudulent, speaks of a mind totally brainwashed in his magical spaghetti monster of choice and the overlords that he works for, probably begun in his young school days.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Yes, lets......
No rethink on BH's necessary. A mystery of sorts certainly, and the professionals are working on that. With open minds btw.
One line of reasoning I heard was they think it may have had a star imbedded withing the cloud.
But most sensible people are not jumping to agenda driven conclusions like you and immediatly questioning BH's.
Perhaps you have heard of the Pioneer anomaly and whether we would need to re model gravity?
Of course more mundane reasons were found.
Are you into many conspiracies my friend?

 

No, that's nonsense on both counts.
The mainstream certainly can be wrong, and I'm posting threads every day on how models/theories, are constantly being revised.
But they are being done by expert professionals.
It wasn't our few foolish trolls on this forum that debunked scientifically the BICEP2 experiment...Sure we had some that said they didn't accept the results, but the law of averages tells us that if some are inclined to deride new results and interpretations constantly, and at every opportunity, that in time, they will jag a winner.
It was of course mainstream science itself that showed the result to be faulty.

The heart burn of course has been evident in your threads constantly being shifted out of science, and then you starting threads to attempt to castigate our evil mods and express your indignation as to all us Idiots that have actually just all been trying to remove your total blinkered view on 21st century cosmology.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Certainly no heart burn on my part, since every claim I have made in recent times, has the backing and support of observational and experimental data, as conducted according to the scientific method and peer review, which you also seem to reject and then fabricate some nonsensical conspiracy.

 

Stable stars don't collapse. What do you imagine unstable stars do? Please answer without your usual bile.

 

Totally false. AGN, are well accepted on evidence available and current knowledge, to simply be BH's in a feeding frenzy.

 

It might be worth posting the link for the lurkers. I don't entertain the view that The God can be turned towards sanity, but I do think lurkers can be educated away from any risk of believing his inarticulate nonsense.

 

You generally either ignore or fail to understand many posts, so I shall repeat an observation I made earlier. Point of information:I am an ignorant bastard. My understanding was that spaghettification occurred as one made a close approach to the event horizon, not after one had passed it. Will you now educate me and correct this misunderstanding?

 

Why not? And I expect proper citation from reputable, peer reviewed journals, or a tightly argued case based upon accepted astrophysics and with all appropriate maths. On the face of it this is the dumbest thing you have said so far.

 

THE GOD is on a short holiday it seems back less than 24hours.
Alex

 

I agree actually......

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500213/public/main (comparing event GW150914 to General Relativity)

https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500217/public/main (how often do pairs of black holes merge?)

https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500218/public/main (more details of analysis)

https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500222/public/main (GW background noise and black hole mergers)

https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500227/public/main (coming next week, search in space for origin of signal)

https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500229/public/main (alternate analysis)

https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500237/public/main (design details of LIGO)

https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500238/public/main (comparing event GW150914 to noise)

https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500248/public/main (calibration details of LIGO)

https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500262/public/main (how event GW150914 demonstrates binary black holes and thoughts about how they form)

https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500269/public/main (statistics on search for merger of black holes)


http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 (open access PDF of paper available) → http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03837

Other LIGO publications referenced in the above.
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500213/public/main (comparing event GW150914 to General Relativity) → http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03841
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500217/public/main (how often do pairs of black holes merge?) → http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03842
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500218/public/main (more details of analysis) →http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03840
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500222/public/main (GW background noise and black hole mergers) → http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03847
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500227/public/main (coming next week, search in space for origin of signal)
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500229/public/main (alternate analysis) →http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03843
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500237/public/main (design details of LIGO) →http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03838
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500238/public/main (comparing event GW150914 to noise) → http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03844
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500248/public/main (calibration details of LIGO) →http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03845
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500262/public/main (how event GW150914 demonstrates binary black holes and thoughts about how they form) →http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03846
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1500269/public/main (statistics on search for merger of black holes) → http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03839

From http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03837 (The PRL paper)

Here's another angle on the news......
http://www.nature.com/news/einstein-s-gravitational-waves-found-at-last-1.19361

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

http://www.nature.com/news/gravitational-waves-6-cosmic-questions-they-can-tackle-1.19337

One of the important scientific consequences of LIGO’s detection of a black-hole merger is, quite simply, that it confirms that black holes really do exist — at least as the perfectly round objects made of pure, empty, warped space-time that are predicted by general relativity.



http://www.nature.com/news/the-black-hole-collision-that-reshaped-physics-1.19612
"The LIGO and Virgo teams soon went to work extracting every bit of information possible. At the most fundamental level, the signal gave them an existence proof:the fact that the objects came so close to each other before merging meant that they had to be black holes, because ordinary stars would need to be much bigger. “It is, I think, the clearest indication that black holes are really there,” says Penrose".



https://www.spacetelescope.org/news/heic1116/

Hubble directly observes the disc around a black hole
4 November 2011

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

A team of scientists has used the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope to observe a quasar accretion disc — a brightly glowing disc of matter that is slowly being sucked into its galaxy’s central black hole. Their study makes use of a novel technique that uses gravitational lensing to give an immense boost to the power of the telescope. The incredible precision of the method has allowed astronomers to directly measure the disc’s size and plot the temperature across different parts of the disc.

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/np...ONS&db_key=PRE
GRB_ 2016ApJ...821L..18P,2016arXiv160302848M, 2016ApJ...819L..21L.


http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.00314
GRB linked to GW150914 was just noise...


Most of those papers were linked by rpenner and a few by myself.

 

Not real sure if that's the dumbest thing he has said.....we have had some recent clangers! One that had me spurting coffee on the computer screen, was not recognising the "BH has no hair" theorem.

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

While I have some disagreement with James on the way that nuts and cranks are given relatively free hand on this forum, James is treating you with kid gloves, and in reality would play you off a break.
Your arrogance in not yet recognising that fact is mind boggling to say the least.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Well... Since, The God, is on a short vacation...

Einstein was wrong! Black holes do exist but they're too damned confusing. My thought would be that Einstein was wrong in the same fashion Newton was wrong - we lack the knowledge for anything better.

 

That of course also means you. The difference being of course is that you deride that which you do not fully understand, nor have any deeper understanding of.

Obviously again, nether did you, as pointed out by rpenner. All I said was that they were not in anyway invalidating BH's and I was correct.

When in fact you have been the only one to have ever crossed those limitations in abuse and disgusting inferences.

That's highly admirable....If true. Do I doubt your word? I most certainly do.
I see someone who has come here berating not just some of cosmology, but all of it, with an obvious religious agenda, and that has been rightly crucified because of the incorrect and mistaken views he has posted.
All your admirable claims are designed now to take you down from the cross...or at least quench your thirst some.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

That is simply a revelation of your ignorance. The term spaghettification, with regards to BH's has been used ever since GR was formulated and the BH prediction was known. Just as the term "BH's have no hair" or even the term BH itself, which was coined by John Wheeler, simply to avoid the actual tongue twisting correct title of a "Gravitationally Completely Collapsed Object".
Not sure who coined "spaghetticiation but it has even been used in reputable scientific papers, and is in common use.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaghettification
"spaghettification (sometimes referred to as the noodle effect[1]) is the vertical stretching and horizontal compression of objects into long thin shapes (rather like spaghetti) in a very strong non-homogeneous gravitational field;
Stephen Hawking[2] describes the flight of a fictional astronaut who, passing within a black hole's event horizon, is "stretched like spaghetti" by the gravitational gradient (difference in strength) from head to toe. However, the term "spaghettification" was established well before this".

I have understood for quite a while now that most of what you claim is total inane rubbish as dictated by your religious agenda and as directed by your overlords.
While information from inside BH's can never be seen or received, we are allowed to make reasonable logical assumptions as has been continually pointed out to you and as agreed by at least three professional replies in a past thread, Professor Hamilton being one of those and from memory, Professor Carlip another.
eg: [1]As per GR, any mass reaching its Schwarzchild radius, will continue to collapse and no known force can stop it, at least up to the quantum/Planck level, where GR is not applicable.[2] If we observe an ergosphere [frame dragging] we can logically assume that we have a spinning, rotating BH.[3] Any object/mass approaching a BH and/or crossing its EH, will be affected by tidal gravitational effects we call spaghettification, and eventual complete disassembling and the overcoming of all forces including the strong nuclear.
These effects could even possibly happen this side of the EH, depending on the size of the BH.

As per usual, when you are cornered and taken to task re your unsupported claims, you quickly then reveal the clown aspect of your nature.

 

I missed that. Did he say that?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

If so, I predict a return of rajesh, or the reappearance of another less frequent anti cosmology pusher.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

One day suspension following my report of his pedophile accusations.