Xelasnave.1947
Valued Senior Member
You should go for a sex change operation and claim the widows pension.It's the retired Midwife come back
Alex
You should go for a sex change operation and claim the widows pension.It's the retired Midwife come back
Ummm not while current tackle still in working conditionYou should go for a sex change operation and claim the widows pension.
Alex
As long as he can make it fit with his beliefs.Honestly Jan... Paddo, although not a professional scientist is about as into science as one could get.
I am not joking.I first started coming here because each day he would faithfully post interesting science news and is so supportive of mainstream science folk often refer to him as a gate keeper for science ... You are joking right?
I am pretty sure it's not about beliefs Jan..Science is science..it lays out the evidence such that we get a wonderful understanding of the world and indeed the Universe. Science is about confidence rather than belief.As long as he can make it fit with his beliefs.
OK pick from the following as it pertains to your call.I am not joking.
That’s why he is not about science. He’s interested as long as it fits with the philosophy.I am pretty sure it's not about beliefs Jan..Science is science..
For you guys materialistic philosophy comes first.lays out the evidence such that we get a wonderful understanding of the world and indeed the Universe. Science is about confidence rather than belief.
No.Are you lieing?
What's wrong with following the philosophy of science?Just like you.
I am not sure what you mean by "materialist philosophy" but it's a good thing right?For you guys materialistic philosophy comes first.
Then you claim ignorance?
Nothing.What's wrong with following the philosophy of science?
It is the idea that matter is all there is.I am not sure what you mean by "materialist philosophy" but it's a good thing right?
My bad.Then you claim ignorance?
It is the idea that matter is all there is.
That’s what atheists have to accept.
More baseless, vengeful, senseless rhetoric from someone at desperation times. Of course its science. You know that, I know that, I accept that, you are in denial.It’s not science.
You’re not for science.
You support a materialist philosophy.
So man is created in the image of God, as it says in the Bible. Now what?
I bet you’ve been waiting to use that line, and you finally got your chance. Well done!Not that I give any credence your claim, but why do you think the bible is the seat of information with regards to man?
I bet you’ve been waiting to use that line, and you finally got your chance. Well done!
Your question is off-topic.
Vengeance: punishment inflicted or retribution exacted for an injury or wrong.More baseless, vengeful, senseless rhetoric from someone at desperation times.
Paddo, you’re about as much for science, as I am for darwinism.You know that, I know that, I accept that, you are in denial.
Interesting.Thank Christ though that there are many christian out there, that at least take an honest approach, unlike your own. You need to take a leaf out of their book.
So it is hypocritical to not give credence to someone’s claim?You often offer many such hypocritical statements.
I f that were true, you would respond with an answer, as my quote was a question.Nope. It's a question directly connected to the OP and is a response to YOUR post, which means YOUR post was off topic, based on your logic.
So it is hypocritical to not give credence to someone’s claim?
Can you explain?
I f that were true, you would respond with an answer, as my quote was a question.
Here it is again: So man is created in the image of God, as it says in the Bible. Now what?
Given that any statement can be turned back on any person that makes one, I wonder why you single me out.It's comical how the statements you make to others can so easily be turned back at you.
So you don’t believe man was made in God’s image. I guess all we can do was s wasn’t t and see where the thread goes.I answered with a rhetorical question. Of course, the answer is probably the other way round, God was created in the image of man, at least, the image of the barbaric, ignorant and gullible man of those times.
G
So you don’t believe man was made in God’s image.
That’s ok. We don’t need to argue over God’s existence. We both know where we Stand in the theism atheism range.Show me God's image, not a painting or depiction of course, but a real picture of God?
Better yet, tell me where I can find God so I can go and see His image in person. Then, I'll give that claim it's due merit.
That’s ok. We don’t need to argue over God’s existence. We both know where we Stand in the theism atheism range.
Do you need an image of the artist, to prove the image of his painting?I was merely asking for an image of God to see where you get your information that man is made in His image. I suppose that's why you operate on a belief system and I don't.