I was reviewing the list of Moderators based on an unrelated issue and noticed that...frankly, some of the backgrounds and experience of moderators doesn't match well with the subfora they're moderating. Without intending offense, science in particular seems to have very few scientists. Why? In all reasonability, shouldn't the (yes, volunteer) staff have at least a (non-farcical) statement of some kind of experience in the area they're monitoring on SF? I'm not suggesting that mods need to be replaced, but a certain reshuffling certainly seems to be in order.