BB is an incomplete theory . A System Universe is more complete.

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by river, Mar 3, 2019.

  1. globali Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    131
    so you are saying that matter is like an egg?
    what do you mean by rotational movement?
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2019
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. river

    Messages:
    11,751
    Yes

    To have length implies breadth .

    360 degrees in a circle . Each degree and smaller is a line with breadth .

    Without breadth there is no length .
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2019 at 4:13 AM
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,192
    I think we're talking to a random quote generator.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    32,160
    So you're not talking about a point as defined in mathematics, but something else. Is that right?
     
  8. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,192
    I think that his post was pointless.
     
  9. river

    Messages:
    11,751

    That's right .

    A point in mathematics

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_(geometry)

    The point is not a element of space .

    Because the point is non-physical .
     
  10. globali Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    131
    so you are introducing your own definition on what is a point?
     
  11. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,192
  12. river

    Messages:
    11,751
    Yes
     
  13. river

    Messages:
    11,751
    I never thought that a point had anything to do with space . Nor energy and matter

    To me a point was on a line , anywhere . In the imagination of mathematics . Nothing physical .

    I looked up again what a , point is , in mathematics .

    I disagreed.
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2019 at 12:53 AM
  14. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    32,160
    Okay, so you have your own definition of what a point is. I still don't understand how that is relevant to the big bang theory, which uses regular mathematics.
     
  15. river

    Messages:
    11,751
    Uses regular mathematics ?

    Explain
     
  16. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    32,160
    The big bang theory is a theory in physics. Physicists make quantitative comparisons between theory and observations using mathematics. In particular, physicists use mathematical ideas like points, and lines, and volumes. More specifically, when physicists refer to a mathematical point in a theory or a mathematical calculation, they use the regular mathematical definition of a point - i.e. a geometrical object with no length, breadth or height - zero dimensions.
     
  17. river

    Messages:
    11,751

    To your last statement , exactly why BB leads to a nothing conclusion .

    Nothing is non-dimensional . Nothing can never exist . Ever

    In reality the Universe is three dimensional . It is a sphere of energy ( with inner depth ) , matter and life .
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2019 at 1:56 AM
  18. globali Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    131
    sounds like a religious statement. Are you writing a new bible or starting a new cult?


    who said that bb says that?
     
    sideshowbob likes this.
  19. river

    Messages:
    11,751
    Gad no .
     
  20. river

    Messages:
    11,751
    Mathematics
     
  21. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    32,160
    But the big bang theory doesn't lead to a nothing conclusion. On the contrary, it reliably explains a number of aspects of our observable universe which would otherwise remain unexplained. It explains why we see distant galaxies red-shifted. It explains the relative ratios of the lightest chemical elements that we observe in nature. It explains the observed microwave background radiation. And more.

    The big bang theory, among other things, is a mathematical model that we use to make predictions about the physical world. The mathematical contents of the model do not "exist" as real objects in the world. The same can be said about any theory in mathematical physics. What the theory says is "if you look at X in the real world, then if the model is correct you should observe behaviour Y."

    Physicists are well aware that even the mathematical description of the initial "singularity" of the big bang probably needs to be modified. As it stands, our understanding of the physics of the very small, under conditions of very high gravity, is not good enough to be confident that any particular modification of the best model is correct. It's a work in progress.

    Why do you think it's a sphere?
     
  22. river

    Messages:
    11,751
    Hmm...

    Anyway BB does not explain the fundamental existence of anything . BB is the consequence of the physical .

    But can not explain the foundation of its physical form .
     
  23. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    32,160
    But I just told you that it explains the microwave background radiation, the relative ratios of light elements and the red-shift of distance galaxies. Aren't all of those "things"?

    I have no idea what that you mean by that.

    So we agree then. Good.
     

Share This Page