BB is an incomplete theory . A System Universe is more complete.

River math, you got to love it!

Example:
Oh no! A stray bullet is headed for me! It is not going to be good, there is a huge amount of Kinetic Energy in the bullet. Wait, I happen to know that KE = 1/2mv^2, and according to river the v^2 cancels so the KE=1/2m of the bullet. So there is nothing to worry about. Thanks River you just saved my life!

This science stuff is easy!?!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

That Day River Stopped a Bullet Dead In Its Tracks With Just His Mind

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

river said: ↑
C^2 , is based on the speed of light , per second / per second , both cancel each other out .

Hence you end up with ; E = M .

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Still no.

You do not know how to math.

What you end up with is a constant of \(9x10^{16} m^2/s^2\).

 

Its not me .

I looked up , asked the question , why is C ( speed of light squared ) ^2 ? In the E=mc^2 equation ; I got ;

C^2 , is based on the speed of light , per second / per second , both cancel each other out .

 

No you didn't.
Provide the reference.

Regardless, it's still wrong.

Riv, what is the point in insisting on this? It is wrong. You are not mathing correctly.

 

https://www.quora.com/Why-is-c-in-E-mc-2

Okay but provide why it is wrong .

 

And where in that reference does it say they cancel?

Look, energy has the form of mass times velocity squared.

If you drive a 1 ton car at 10mph, you will do X damage.
If you drive a 1 ton car at 20mph, you will do x^2 as much damage (so, 2 squared is 4 times as much damage). (This is why so many more people are killed at 40mph than at 20mph.)

The energy of a moving object is proportional to the square of its velocity.
So, to get energy out of a mass you have to square its velocity.

The speed of light is a velocity. When you square it, you get an equivalence between the mass of a particle and its energy.

 

It will , not far from the begining of the thread .

 

Otherwise why it is wrong ?

Explain

 

You lie like a rug.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

See post 148.

 

Why would I do that ?

 

Then quote the passage where it says c^2 cancels out.
(Not that it matters. Quorum is a terrible place to look for answers. It's still wrong even if some doofus said it.)

 

You know I can't , quote , against the rules on this site .

If its wrong tell us why .

 

To your last statement . Disagree

So light speed can be squared ? 300,000 km per/second , is now , 900,000,000 per/second to get energy from mass ?

 

That is false. Quote it.

River: 2+2=5.
Dave: No. 2+2=4.
River: 2+2=5.
Dave: Still wrong.
River: Explain why it's wrong.
Dave: Because that's not how you math.

 

No. The velocity is squared and ends up as a constant. It is not a velocity, and it is not the velocity of light.

The velocity of your car is squared to figure out how how much kinetic energy it has in a collision.
The formula for kinetic energy is \(K=1/2mv^2\)
See that \(v^2\) in there? You're squaring the velocity to convert mass into energy. In this case it's simple kinetic energy of motion, but the same thing applies to mass-energy equivalence, you're just using a different constant.

 

300,000 km/ second , squared , is 9.0 ^16 .

9 followed by 16 zeros to the right of nine .

Is that how you see E=mc^2 ?

 

That is the constant that converts mass to energy.

Still waiting for that quote.