Black holes do not exist

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Luchito, Mar 3, 2021.

  1. Dennis Tate Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,154

    You may well derive some comfort from your being on somewhat the same page as Mr. John Horgan when it comes to the type of theories that fascinate me.


    https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...ew-theory-of-everything-is-the-same-old-crap/

     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Its not time that was synchronized but physical movements that are .
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,089
    Exactly, time cannot be synchronized, it is a result of duration of physical change.

    Note that metronomes have adjustable time rate slides which must match, else the metronome is unable to match the rate of duration of the other metronomes and acquire synchronicity.

    p.s. river, how do you account for the synchronized flashes of the fireflies. Nothing physical between them, yet they flash in perfect synchrony .
     
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2021
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Not time slides , how does time " slide " .

    Metronomes get in synch through movements which passed to all others . Time had nothing to do with the synch .
     
  8. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,089
    OK, edited it to read "time rate". Move the weight up or down the slide to control the rate of time as set by the musician.

    Metronomes get in synch through movements which passed to all others . Time had nothing to do with the synch .[/QUOTE] Yes it does. The metronomes have adjustable time rates, not free variable time rates.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Metronome
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metronome

    p.s. maybe of interest to musicians: https://www.metronomeonline.com/


     
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2021
  9. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,089
    All this really belongs in the Time thread.
     
  10. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Movement .

    Write4U response

    [/QUOTE] Yes it does. The metronomes have adjustable time rates, not free variable time rates.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Metronome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metronome

    p.s. maybe of interest to musicians: https://www.metronomeonline.com/


    [/quote]

    And All these " time rates " are based on the Physical movements of the metronome .

    What started the metronome moving ? The physical .
     
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2021
  11. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,089
    Movement creates duration (time).
    So what does that tell you?
    Right, Time is created (emerges) along with duration of movement.

    By adjusting the metronome, the musician is setting the rate of time for his/her composition. Local time within Universal time.
     
  12. river

    Messages:
    17,307

    Yes but not time . To observers there is time . To objects there is duration based on the environment and their properties .
     
  13. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,089
    No.

    What is duration recording?
    Duration Recording - Earlywood Educational Services
     
  14. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    And if duration is not recorded ?
     
  15. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,089
    This may be of interest;

    Physicist Develops Software Solution to Measure Black Hole Stability
    https://scitechdaily.com/even-if-a-...l-model-it-doesnt-mean-it-exists-in-reality/#
     
  16. river

    Messages:
    17,307

    Based on the physical . Duration is based on the physical movements of things . Do you think that the duration date matters to physical objects themselves ? Their movements . No . The beginning and end is dictated by the physical objects themselves . Dates are irrelevant .
     
  17. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    To your last statement ;

    Because they are coming to the conclusion that the mathematics doesn't match observation . Galactic Jets for example . Which eject from both poles . Not one pole as black-hole theory would suggest .
     
  18. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,089
    I agree. Date and Time only have meaning to humans.
    All other organisms only experience duration, some of which maybe shortly remembered by living cells, some with long duration in brained animals, for purposes of migration, hibernation, mating, hunting , fruiting.
     
    river likes this.
  19. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,089
    Then perhaps we aren't talking about black holes, but pulsars?
     
  20. river

    Messages:
    17,307

    No black-holes , which are suppose to be at the center of all Galaxies .
     
  21. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,089
    How do you know that what you are observing is located at the center of a galaxy.
    Remember, Galaxies are subject to dynamic distortion from a variety of external influences.
    Remember also that the light from pulsars may have been emitted 10 billions of years ago and the pulsar has since collapsed into black hole. Not saying that's how it happens but given the age of human science, galaxies are much older objects than our solar system, so what we see is no longer there. [quote[Most galaxies are between 10 billion and 13.6 billion years old. Our universe is about 13.8 billion years old, so most galaxies formed when the universe was quite young![/quote]
    https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/galaxies-age/en/
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2021
  22. river

    Messages:
    17,307

    So not black-holes .
     
  23. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,089
    Not then, but maybe now!
     

Share This Page