Black Holes .

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by river, Aug 11, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,023
    Because you basically failed to at least review as to what a scientific theory really is?
    Because you seem to support river, whose reputation is gullible at best and positively anti science at worst?
    Because when you are given reasonable answers [as per what a scientific theory really is] you fail to acknowledge it and the fact that you are wrong?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. davewhite04 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,884
    So you seriously believe that I had never heard of a scientific theory? I'm pretty sure river knows.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,677
    See post 217 for an extant example.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. davewhite04 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,884
    Is this is what's meant for the saying "feeding the trolls", if it ain't it is now.
     
  8. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,677
    Correct. We are indulging you, that - with a few pats in the right direction - perhaps you can yet be saved.
     
  9. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,023
    Well had you? I mean as distinct from how a theory is defined every day?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Are you? Why do you think he is banned from the sciences sections? Like I said, river's only "quality" is gullibility.
    You could ask him if you like about the atomic war between Alien species on Mars?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  10. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,677
    Ask him why he thinks DHMO should be banned as a lethal substance.
     
  11. river

    Messages:
    14,698
    DMHO stands for what ?
     
  12. river

    Messages:
    14,698
    What gullibility ?

    You see I think , you are gullible .

    BH have no essence , no material , physical essence upon which it is derived .

    If you can can tell me otherwise I look forward to your post .
     
  13. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,677
    This should go viral.

    river: you heard about DHMO, and how it can kill humans of inhaled. It is in almost everything we eat, and can dissolve many common materials.

    You grew alarmed that such a toxin was so prevalent, and agreed that it should be banned.

    And then we told you DHMO is di-hydrogen monoxide - better known as ... water.

    You demonstrated a complete lack of effort to learn any facts about the substance before deciding you needed to take a stand on banning it.

    That is a cartoonish level of gullibility. It shows how easily you can be manipulated into believing even the most transparent, and trivially-refutable non-facts.

    The take away lesson here is:ask all the questions you want - but for your own sake, don't try to make claims about things of which you are ignorant.

    Such as this nonsense:
     
  14. river

    Messages:
    14,698
    I forgot .
     
  15. river

    Messages:
    14,698
    Tell me otherwise .
     
  16. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,677
    Have done so, several times.

    You're not interested in learning. You only ask enough questions until you can start making ignorant assertions. Why should I keep falling for that trick?


    That's why you've been banned from the science forums.
     
  17. river

    Messages:
    14,698
    It's not a trick question , it is a legitimate question ; in order for a BH to become upon what form of energy or matter is it based ?

    What is this singularity based upon ?
     
  18. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,677
    That's two different questions - one about a black hole, the other about the singularity at its centre.

    When you say "based upon", what kind of answer are you looking for? Do you want to know how black holes form, and what properties they have?


    I'm not falling for it, river. I've been patient explaining things to you before, but I've been down this road with you too many times. You will only listen long enough to decide that you know enough to decide it's nonsense.
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2019
  19. river

    Messages:
    14,698

    Yet what the BH is based upon ; you can't answer .

    A singularity has to have a physical aspect to it .
     
  20. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,677
    The fact that you don't understand the answer is your loss.

    But thank you for confirming my suspicion that you have no interest in learning the first thing about the science involved.

    You do realize that science will somehow manage to survive despite your rejection of it?
     
  21. river

    Messages:
    14,698
    You realize that science evolves . In thought . In History of science .

    From the Greeks . To Newton ; to Einstein . To the present day , 2019 .
     
  22. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,677
    Yes. In Newton's time we had no black holes.
    In Einstein's time, we do.
    Our understanding of physics has evolved as we learn more.
     
  23. river

    Messages:
    14,698

    Indeed

    Question is upon what is the BH based ? Beyond the mathematics .

    Mathematics of BH needs a physical attribute to it to be a real .

    What physical properties does the singularty have ?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page