Cartoon porn kids are people

Once you are told about what it looks like, you can't see it in any other way.
It will make us a laughing stock.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Challenger.
The internet needs regulation.
All they have to do is put all the porn onto say .sex
Then people can block it if they wish, or block everything else if they wish.
Where's the problem?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Too late for that!
It's not even as though it takes a lot of imagination to see it, so how they could have a group of people look at it and not one of them manage to spot it is beyond me. The cost is even more unthinkable, just another waste of money. I'm clearly in the wrong line of work however!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The ruling is beyond stupid. Is that magistrate one of the moderators here?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I wonder what proportion of people they would have to prosecute if they could examine every computer?

The situation at the moment is like having free drink on display at every shop and supermarket, and prosecuting everyone who becomes an alcoholic.
You have to stop it at source.

Service providers should be blocking sexual material. Even the stupid Bart cartoons, which is not even porn just a sick joke. Not that I've ever seen any Bart cartoons, you understand, and I didn't think they were very funny anyway.

You should be required to opt into it, and pay some charge with a credit card.
The charge would be whatever it costs to pay for the screening, which I'm sure could be done using the current net spiders.
Many computer chipped cameras now have face recognition, and it's not just faces which have a recognisable shape.


I know people like the idea of free expression etc. but the internet is like a modern version of the wild west. It needs regulation.

 

Trial lawyer could easily win any case by showing that after porn magazines were aviable in Sweden for the first time, rape rate went down....

Act as safety valve. When humans have urges they would do anything to statisfy those urges...

Having a bunch of pedophiles quietly masturbating at home to cartoons is much better than them roaming the street looking for victims...

 

Oh cool, if a cartoon kid is drawn drinking alchohol can someone be arrested for serving alchohol to a minor? If I draw a picture of bart simpson lighting my house on fire, can I sue marge and homer? The possibilities are mind boggling.

 

Hmm, but what happens if those same porno cartoons excite them enough to go out roaming the streets seeking those victims?

Perhaps what we have here is a two-edged sword, huh?

Baron Max

 

How? And equally important ...who?

I'm afraid that a monster has been created with no way to kill it.

Baron Max

 

Well since cartoon character's are people too. :shrug: I don't know anymore.

 

A valid concern, but I would say no. Here is the reasoning:

Poor and ugly people get statisfaction too by using porn but don't necesserily go out on the street raping people. So I don't see why it should be different for pedophiles... As long as they can live out their fantasies in a safe way, good for society...

 

So you think that pedophiles are "poor and ugly"???

Geez, what kind of "-ism" is that ....."poor-ism" ..."ugly-ism"?

Baron Max

 

Hahahahaahaaahhahaha....

 

So what about this Disney movie?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

That's always a diificulty when it comes to censorship, which is what I'm proposing. It's a valid question.
I don't think material that comes into the home through the internet should have different rules on content than what comes into the home through a TV set. I mean US TV and UK TV not Saudi TV, so yes I am applying my own country's standards.
When it came down to it, it would be US standards which held sway.

Someone earlier mentioned Sweden, and yes they have permissive regulations, but they do have limits and specified outlets.

I don't think there is any will to do anything.
The creation of a separate domain for sexual material is a simple matter.
It wouldn't of course solve the problem but it would be a move in the right direction.

I'm not talking about Bart cartoons here.
That is just stupid nonsense, and the judge that ruled it as child porn is an idiot.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Btw. Are there any Australians on here from New South Wales?
What other strange laws are there in this state?
Being branded as a sexual pervert for possession of a Bart cartoon is one.
What others do you have?
The death sentence for not keeping a dog on a leash?
Two hundred lashes for dropping litter?
What?

 

Marge is looking good these days!

 

Who gets to define porn ? and what if someone wants to block Communist sites as well ?

 

The Internet is a helluva lot different to TV. I don't know the Internet and computers very well, but my guess is that if people want to provide it, there's a way to get it.

With TV, they can censor the broadcasters. With the Internet, who do you censor? With the Internet, the sites are out there just waiting, ...how CAN you censor something that's everywhere?

I'm afraid that we've created a monster that can't be killed.

Baron Max

 

Again, a good question, but I'd personally be happy with the US Government making the decisions on sexual content. As regards political content, that could have a much wider remit.

It's not that I think that they'd do it any better than anyone else, just that the US might make more progress.

The main point I am making is that the same regulations should cover the internet as cover TV and Cable. Cable allows people wider choice, but they opt in for it and pay for it.
At the moment, the internet is like having every cable channel and adult video shop on mainstream TV. This is bad.
TV and internet are merging as a source of entertainment and information.

I'm not saying that it would be easy, but why is there no attempt to do anything.
Other, that is, than drive some poor sap to the point of suicide, for having a cartoon of a type which is probably on every student's computer in the Western World.

Meanwhile, mass exploiters of Women Men and Children are making Billions of Pounds with very little restricting their activities.

Hypocrisy? Stupidity?
You tell me.

 

Come on man, you have been improving so much, don't fall back!

It was an analogy....

 

Many paedophiles are clever, influential and screwed up.
If , in the future, you want 50 times as many as there are at present, just leave things as they are.