And, not coincidentally, that's pretty much precisely what the paper linked in the OP addresses (among other thing). "Other things" like: Though that "political inertia" part strikes me as a bit, I don't know, generous, but I suppose it's apt for a global audience.
ok the paper had some interesting material a tad lacking in details from my perspective and I disagree with "is now necessary" one helluva sales pitch but ...............................................
I do agree with the idea that action "now" is necessary. But piecemeal patches here and there are probably not anywhere near sufficient to avoid disaster. What is required is a worldwide concerted effort to curb our CO2 emissions or a method to re-sequester the released CO2, on a worldwide scale.
Of course you do. You're still trying to argue that the weather around Greenland during the last natural warming spell is evidence that the laws of physics formerly governing the planetary warming effects of CO2 have been repealed recently.