DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Yes. The question is: do you?Just goes to show you that believers can be objective about this subject too.
Yes. The question is: do you?Just goes to show you that believers can be objective about this subject too.
"While the report [of Haines and Vallee] did look into the possibility of some type of debris on the film or its film plane back-plate was discussed and disregarded, they never looked at the camera itself.Next thing to do is to get a manual (Haynes type thing) for the relevant aircraft, and see what parts possibly look like the object, that could have fallen off.![]()
Jacques Vallée a Ph.D. in industrial engineering and computer science along with Richard F. Haine a Ph.D. in psychology, both studied a photo of a ''ufo''.Did you know that the authors of this study, Haines and Vallee, are both famous ufologists in addition to being scientists?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_ValléeProfessionally, he began to conduct early artificial intelligence research and received a Ph.D. in industrial engineering and computer science from the institution in 1967.
http://archives.library.rice.edu/repositories/2/resources/1404Richard F. Haines, PhD, was an American psychologist working for NASA and various other research organizations between 1967 and 1988. Since the 1980s Haines became actively involved into the study of UFO phenomena and after retirement he dedicated most of his time to this topic.
You mean you'll ignore Occam's razor and stick to the ufo hypothesis.Impressive analysis Dave. I'll apply Occam's razor and stick to the ufo hypothesis.![]()
That is not a problem. No one here expected otherwise.Impressive analysis Dave. I'll apply Occam's razor and stick to the ufo hypothesis.![]()
I also have been screwing my eyes up playing around with that picture.OK, I'm just having some fun now.
If I screw my eyes up, it looks a bit like the light and dark areas are lumps - like what happens when you leave a
As Dave says, it's probably an optical artifact of some kind
Were not the producers (those who put it into public domain UFO enthusiastics?
Oh look this frame has a defect which looks UFO ish
Didn't they then enhance said defect
The ORIGINAL never been fiddled with frame not in public domain
![]()