Discussion in 'Physics & Math' started by Hamsterspawn, Feb 14, 2005.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
Hamsterspawn, Caveat Emptor oh budding scienid=st. In you r request for informaion on nonotechnology one post in your thread gave a few lines of what nonotechnologyu was all abnout. Having some experinece with the methods of this poster I typed in "nanotechnology" for a googe search and found the same word forms and and phrases that were not passed on with any refefrences.. The reply regarding 'nanotechnology' that was provided the freaders iof this thread left me with the sense that the poster was asserting familiarity in the subject as scientist or expert. This isn't the case. Do you want to try a science test? you try the 'nanotechnology' search and compare to the reply by Persol.
I am just trying to keep the playing field even as they say. Persol has a propaganda agenda see if you can ferret out what tha agenda is.
Are you implying that Persol was plaigiarising?
By the way, it doesn't take long to proof read your posts. Fix those spelling mistakes.
You would of course be referring to words like plagiarizing. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Someone got it.
Americans plagiarize. The British are aware that some nationalities plagiarise. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Yes, and we are all British here Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! !!!
Nice statement Ophiolite.
Oh, whats premotioners problem?
'Nanotechnology is basically using individual atoms as building blocks' is about as simple a definition as you can get... and is certainly the type of wording that someone would use in technical writing. I didn't say anything about nanotechnology that most people on this forum don't already know.... no google search required...
I thought I was spelling correctly OK OK
Separate names with a comma.