The 99.9% who can control their sex drives. The remainder cannot control them and it drives them to antisocial behavior and even crime.
Interesting sentence from this link is: "About 10% of rams (males) refuse to mate with ewes (females) but do readily mate with other rams." Does this show that homosexuality amongst rams has no hereditary basis? Rams that did not breed would have no progeny. Or are there benefits to the flock from homosexual rams? Maybe the occasional gay ram cheers up the flock in bad times and so helps group survival. For example, if there is not enough grass, there may be a part of the field more "fashionable" or with a better view.
PhysBang, There was really no need to open up a new can of worms, I just wanted to know how you defined homosexulal (HS) activity, as opposed to HS behaviour, as opposed to HS orientation jan.
OK: whatever Deity made humans the way they are made them unable to choose their prompts of sexually arousal. ? Control is a sex issue, and vice versa.
Correct. I wasn't claiming that .025% was 1 in 4. I WAS saying that if only 1 out of 4 people who commits rape is convicted, then the number of rapists goes from .025% to .1%. (.025 * 4 = .1)
Really? You think that this opened a can of worms? It's just the facts that there is far, far more natural sexual activity than heterosexual human reproduction. Far more. You (and others) invoked "natural". That's why many of the things Christians say are crazy.
Like I said I just wanted to know how you define homosexulal (HS) activity, as opposed to HS behaviour, as opposed to HS orientation. Do I really need to specify human beings? jan.
No. Both heterosexuals and homosexuals have committed rape. Rape is not a sexual orientation, it is a crime.