...DID we go to the moon?

Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by GeoffP, May 14, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. sweetpea Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,329
    Hold-on. Your saying there are real people in the space station?
    I heard it was all CGI (Computer generated imagery). Of course, we are not talking here about your usual run of the mill computer, but, the secret ones at NASA or was it Area 51?
    Hmmm... FF resurrects a five year old thread so it can be active during the fiftieth anniversary year of the moon landing. Oxygen.
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2019
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,275
    I know! He's so gullible. Here's proof that the ISS is fake, by almost Nobel prizewinner and successful author J.P. Skinner:

    http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2010/184/fake-starfield.htm

    And here's more on The Conspiracy:

    https://wiki.tfes.org/The_Conspiracy

    Remember, there is no Flat Earth Conspiracy. Everyone can see it is flat with their own eyes. It is a Space Travel Conspiracy!
     
    sweetpea likes this.
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,572
    Yep, it's the 'net version of taking a dump on somebody's front lawn.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    275
    No he isn't. Prove it, but without resorting to another moronic conspiracy.

    Seems spot on. You got your ass kicked yet again.

    I truly think that anyone who thinks they are filming the space walk in water is a complete moron. There are numerous reasons why a flag would do any number of things in a vacuum, but in water, it simply does not flap so effortlessly. You cannot possibly believe that is in water.

    Your nemesis kicks your ass here as well:



    You are a liar. You keep making this claim that you are being censored, when what us happening is your off topic spam is getting removed. The flag moves exactly the way it would in a vacuum. You have zero credibility, your attempt at hijacking this thread with such obvious drivel is pathetic.

    Spam.

    You started posting here because you have some serious OCD issues and a complete inability to see how crazy your claims are.
     
  8. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    275
    You are an appalling spammer who has not one ounce of credibility. You have demonstrated an appalling dishonesty on this thread and everywhere you post.

    Pathetic spammer complaining about his span being removed.

    Because they have all been debunked. Nobody cares whether YOU think they haven't - they have and you are a busted dead hand.

    Get A Life. Forums have had enough of this bullshit. Some have sections for the loonies, but most don't tolerate them.

    You don't "thwart" anything. You are one of the biggest jokes on the internet. I'm sure you have this need for notoriety even if it's as the biggest failure online.

    Did you now! That second video details over a thousand in a matter of a few weeks.

    Get A Life.

    Who cares, it isn't "info" it's bullshit.

    The big problem is not that your spammed crap has fallen a thousand times, it is that you refuse to accept it. It fell on its own dis-merit 10 years plus ago.

    You're not being censored, nobody is. There is no lie being defended, there are some forums that won't put up with YOUR lies!

    Oh shutup!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect
     
  9. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    275
    An utterly ridiculous statement. Let's dissect it.

    YOU make the ridiculous claim that the Chinese are in a swimming pool and not in space, because of some moronic and highly selective observations, then the man who routinely kicks your sorry ass, kicks your sorry ass over this and because YOU disagree with him, he must therefore be a paid sophist and doesn't believe his own argument?

    Where is your proof he doesn't believe this totally obvious debunk of your nonsensical claim and where is your proof that this makes him a paid sophist. EVEN IF you had made a sound solid argument(and I've yet to see that from you!!) it would still only mean he was wrong. Do you ever wonder why most people think you a bit on the sad side?

     
  10. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    532
    All of you pro-Apollo people seem to be maintaining that the flag movement in the video in post #153...
    http://www.sciforums.com/threads/did-we-go-to-the-moon.134682/page-8#post-3568738

    ...is consistent with its being in a vacuum. This pretty much destroys your credibility and all of the viewers have seen it. You can't save this with attitudes and snide remarks. That anomaly is simply too clear to obfuscate. There's a point at which things are so clear that sophistry simply becomes ineffective. That anomaly is in that category.
     
  11. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,572
    What is it we're not supposed to feed?
     
  12. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    275
    This is the guy that believes bubbles are jagged, rotating, quickly enlarging and that flags swivel in water. This is the guy who thinks Macca was replaced

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    I do not wish to clutter this thread with all the mad batshit nonsense you suck up.

    You are the internet equivalent of a blocked toilet. Full of it, un-flushable and it just keeps overflowing.
     
  13. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    532
    No matter how lame your arguments are, you people have the attitude that you have the upper hand. The truth is that it's pretty clear that you don't even believe your own arguments.

    You'll never admit anything though.

    http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html
    http://www.whale.to/b/sweeney.html
    (excerpt)
    -----------------------------------------------
    6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of 'artificial' emotionalism and an unusually thick skin -- an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial. Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal. Butdisinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the 'image' and are hot and cold with respect topretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It's justa job, and they often seem unable to 'act their role in character' as well in a communicationsmedium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later -- an emotional yo-yo. With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game -- where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style,substance, and so forth, or simply give up.
    -----------------------------------------------

    You're about as impressive as the black Knight in this video.

    Monty Python - The Black Knight - Tis But A Scratch
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmInkxbvlCs
     
  14. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,275
    Honestly, the only reason I read your posts is for amusement. You are someone I can point to when other people say "come on, no one is THAT stupid."
     
    sideshowbob likes this.
  15. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,882
    "lack of faith in god" ?
    huh ?

    is the attitude the belief ?
    or
    is the argument the lack of god ?

    you cant use faith as a reasoning tool to prove lack of scientific fact when you do not provide any scientific fact to begin with.

    its like saying "don't believe in the invisible chair when your sitting on the floor"

    subjectivity debates around faith in history is called religious philosophy
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2019
  16. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    33,118
    FatFreddy:

    If you're going to make accusations that somebody is being paid to spread disinformation, then you really ought to present some evidence to support your accusation. Failing that, it's at best your opinion and at worst it makes you look like a paranoiac.

    Given the persistency with which you apparently spam your anti-moon landing propaganda around the internet, it would seem equally possible that you're being paid, or possibly you think there is some kind of non-monetary personal advantage that is to be gained from your continuing efforts.

    Notice, however, that nobody is trying to dismiss your arguments on the basis that you're paid, or even that you're biased (as you clearly are). Rather, your arguments have been addressed on their merits, such as they are.

    I'd say your work here is probably done, since you apparently have nothing new to present on this forum that you haven't already posted to twenty other forums. You seem more interested in carrying on some kind of personal battle than in actually debating the topic any more.

    What do you think?
     
  17. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    532
    There used to be a good video on YouTube by a guy whose YouTube channel name was Stevethechemist. He had a video in which he showed that the guy making the jump in this video was on a wire.

    John Young's Lunar Salute on Apollo 16



    He compared the falling soil with the falling sand in volleyball games on the beach. You can put YouTube videos in slow-motion by clicking on the six-sided star that's on the lower right-hand corner of the videos.

    Start watching this video in slow-motion at the 5:44 time mark.

    TOP 40 Crazy Actions Beach Volleyball | FIVB Beach Volleyball World Champs 2017



    When the guy on the right in the foreground jumps, the sand goes up as high as his foot does. When the Apollo astronaut jumps, the soil he kicks up starts falling before the astronaut starts coming back down. That can be explained by the astronaut's being helped by a support wire. Can anyone else offer another explanation?
     
  18. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,572
    Yeah, your grasp of dynamics is weak.
     
  19. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 69 years old Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,049
    Sorry you so confused
    Seriously get a grip on reality

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  20. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 69 years old Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,049
    OMG never noticed that about same menus

    So with China gone and according to Flat Earthers Australia does not exist

    We really messed up reality

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  21. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,882
    flat earthers probably get a 50% discount for republican party membership
     
  22. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,882
    i think u found urself a genuine conspiracy writer there.
    sounds just like a republican party media release.
     
  23. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 69 years old Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,049

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Well think if so will see if he gets added to my 30+ Iggy club

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    RainbowSingularity likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page