Do you approach conversations in good faith?

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by wegs, May 8, 2019.

  1. wegs Matter and Pixie Dust Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,253
    This is a good way to approach conversations in good faith. Just getting your point ''heard'' is worthwhile.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Agreed

    We all need to improve in this area .

    In the end , truth wins .
     
    wegs likes this.
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    = preloaded(pre-concieved assumed meaning) faith based absolute ...

    truth is rarely desired by either side of the argument if it gets in the way of winning.
    this is played out in USA court rooms many times every day in liable law suites to make money from.

    also copying other peoples music by stopping one bar short of the copywrite law but including enough for most people to recognise that as being created and owned by someone else.

    the truth is theft
    truth doesn't win at all and the end happens many times each day.

    it is legal and it is un-truthful and truth is losing always many times per day
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Agreed

    The bane of our society is cheating .

    Cheating is looked upon as a good attitude to have . I disagree .

    Cheating leads to a society having no trust .
     
  8. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    while i agree with a normalised concept of your moral frame work,
    i believe the societal benefit in non cheating is around the construction of the psyche & consequential personality which drives the long term outcomes from the individuals engaging in group action.
     

Share This Page