Did you read that? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! It is the same thing John.. lol
. hmm, may be kidna true, animals do turn into ashes, or it's bones, slowly by time turn into ash, also rocks can be buldozed, and buldozed again, to make it like ashes, but, i don't think they can turn into rock, but they can in cartoon, or anime, Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! and you shouldnt call him stupid, his kinda, smart, to think like that, to think deeply, but he also needs more facts, and reaserches, and more knoledge about life, but he don't know much of those, so, he's thinking is kidna silly, but i don't say stupid, if just got that idea and thoght about it, it means he have a brain, oh i haev a question to him, are you alive? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
There are other senses involved so a brain is nice but not a strict requirement for being alive. sensory organs or thing that, frankly, i nor anyone else is aware of presently, but they can perform simialr functions.
Also wrong. You believe (on no evidence) the same way you believe that trees aren't alive: i.e. totally incorrectly. I wasn't even aware Enmos was logged in until I saw his post. In other words: if you have ridiculous ideas back them up or don't post them. It only makes you appear to be more stupid.
hm, yeah, but still there a huge difference between alive=living things VS non-living things but brain is the difference, between, alive, and living
Umm.. animals do turn into 'rock'. It's called fossilization. The organic materials of the organism are gradually replaced by minerals. I didn't call him stupid, but I could have.
. john i have a very good questions for you, and answer me! Are you alive? Are you a living? Are you a plant? Are you a mater?
I PM-ed no one in the last hour. I advice you to take back your lies immediately. And, FYI, both Dywyddyr and I are invisible. So even if I did PM him you have no way of knowing that.
actually, fossilisation, is not an animal turn into rocks, for example, le's take a turtle, when turtle dies in soem surquestences, maybe mud, or the sediment materials, that later will take the animal's shape. the turtle house, will stay into that mater, it will leave a trace, when the mater become rock, after it filled the inner body of the turtle, it finally, will have it's shape, like making a copy but from a different matter
Which bit of: or do you not understand? Just for your information my last PM from Enmos is dated 29th January 2010, and I didn't even know he was around (as stated) until I saw his post #72.
I dont know what he was trying to show with that example. It doesnt even fit with what was discussed. I think he is conditioned to respond with something fossil related when there is no real response.