Does time exist?

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Asexperia, Sep 28, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,546
    Experts ?? Those experts whose repeatability is less than 50%..
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,546
    Can you find fault with what I suggested ?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    That's around 50% better then your own amateurish nonsense.
    It must be heart breaking for someone with your ego to be an absolute nobody.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,546
    Find fault with what I posted about origin of time....drop the personal nonsense.
     
  8. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    I have told you many times about the origin of time, along with space [henceforth known as spacetime]
    That is what the BB says.
    What you say is gobblydook and just a follow on from your free thoughts.
    And what you see as personal, is factual....and that's the point I'm making, not that I need to anymore with your reputation.
     
  9. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,546
    Basically you don't want to think beyond BB....ok
     
  10. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    The BB was derived from GR and universal expansion.
    Time and space evolved at that instant.
    You're the one on the outside trying to get in: The onus is on you to show any accepted mainstream theory is wrong. You have so far had in excess of 1700 posts and many nonsensical threads to do that in and have failed.
    And of course while you may not like to hear it, what you claim on this remote forum, makes no difference in the greater scheme of things:
    There's a stiff breeze blowing astern, and you are standing aft pissing into it.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  11. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,546
    Focus on the content..
     
  12. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    The content supports overwhelmingly the mainstream, accepted position.
    You again are pissing into the wind without any support for what you say.
     
  13. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,725
    Please guys, do not deal with personal matters in this thread.
     
  14. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,725
    THE PHILOCHRON LINE PROOFS THAT TIME IS ABSOLUTE

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    - For Albert Einstein, we do not perceive things but the light they reflect. Einstein interprets reality as an illusion.

    - All observers are in the present.

    - The reference moment set is immovable because it is in the past.

    - The speed affects the operation of the GPS watches, but not time.
     
  15. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,072
    May I ask for a definition of the word "absolute" in context of the OP question.
    It seems to imply that Time is a dimension, independent of the other 3 spatial dimensions.
    Is time *absolute* in the absence of change or geometry?

    How old is Time? Oddly it seems to be exactly as old as the universe, which would imply that *time* (duration) was a result of the BB. For our universe (POV) the BB was the beginning of time as we know it. A natural mathematical function or expression of duration of change or existence.
     
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2016
    Asexperia likes this.
  16. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,725
    The relation of time with space is that changes occur in the second one.

    Absolute: not depending on comparison with other things.

    Present is common to all measures of time.
     
  17. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,072
    I believe you need to rephrase this post. As written it presents logical conflicts.
     
  18. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,725
    The relation between time and space is screw type. The screw connects but does not stick. It is a circumstancial relation. It is a combination, not a mixture.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 14, 2016
  19. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,072
    I would argue that the specific environment which allows for change is circumstantial, but Time (duration of change) is a *result* of such relationships and is *totally* dependent on the type of change. This is why we have been forced to invent related increments of time, from nano-seconds to millennia.

    IMO, the smallest increment of time is a result of a quantum event in a *permittive condition".
     
  20. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,072
    And what is beyond or earlier than the BB? And even if there was *something* before the BB, what was before that *something* and what was before that, etc, etc.

    All that is currently known started with the BB (Inflation). Beyond (prior to) the beginning of our universe, nothing is *known* and any attempt to explain the physical causality must be classified as *speculative*. To my knowledge, no one has ever provided a falsifiable equation of the exact sequence of causal forces which produced the BB.
     
  21. black mask Registered Member

    Messages:
    57
    I think time exist due to movement of universe. Stronger the gravity slower is the time.so if universe had too much gravity and all the atoms had no movement then won't exist the time.as it is assumed that time does not flow in black hole and I think big bang theory and string theory is the face of same coin.
     
  22. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    Maybe movement of universe exist due to time.

    That is relative to a region of weaker gravity.

    Clearly, then, the universe does not have "too much gravity", because movement exists.

    That is not assumed. Not by scientists, anyway.

    Those two theories are really about different things.
     
  23. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,072
    Existence of the universe functions through quantum. If quantum function were to stop, the universe would simply disappear and time would cease to exists.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page