Elvis Sibilia's Philochrony theory of everything

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Asexperia, Feb 14, 2020.

1. river

Messages:
17,307

No problem to me .

3. AsexperiaValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,721
EXPLANATIONS OF TIME

These are the explanations of time offered by Philochrony:

1) The magnitive time (09-16-2017).
2) The change-interval duality (06-30-2019).
3) The indefinite parallelochron (02-24-2020).
4) The transchrony or portal of time (06-06-2020).
5) The definite parallelochron (06-20-2020).

The magnitive time gave rise to the other explanations.

THE DEFINITE PARALLELOCHRON

All changes are represented in the parallelochron. Logically, Vx E Pc (for all x that belongs to the parallelochronon).

Duration is the sequential occurrence of phenomena delimited by a beginning and an end. Time is the regular duration divisible into equal intervals (measures). In this sense, time is objective, imperceptible and measurable. Duration is a property of things and time is its measure.

Asexperia

Last edited: Jul 4, 2020

5. AsexperiaValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,721
The parallelochron is the fusion into a single scheme of the timelines of all changes.

7. AsexperiaValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,721
PHILOCHRONY IS A NATURAL SCIENCE

1- Object of study: nature of time.

2- Method: observation and register of the duration of phenomena.

3- Instruments: clocks, calendars and Chronology.

4- Verifiability: any researcher can verify that:

a) Time is the regular duration (uniform rhythm) divisible into equal intervals.

b) Time is objective, imperceptible and measurable (magnitive).

c) The timelines of phenomena can be unified into a single scheme (parallelochron).

Last edited: Jul 18, 2020
8. Write4UValued Senior Member

Messages:
19,970
Lol, nor to me....

However, should we take this as an authoritative description of a "wave"? ;
https://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/waves/Lesson-1/What-is-a-Wave

I'm sure you can see the apparent contradiction. How to resolve this dilemma?

Seems the question is if "energy has mass?
https://www.quora.com/Does-energy-have-mass-or-light-as-in-light-beam-have-mass

Last edited: Jul 19, 2020
9. AsexperiaValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,721
Write4U likes this.
10. AsexperiaValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,721
WHY DOES TIME EXIST?

In Philochrony time is the regular periodic duration divisible into equal intervals. Duration is the continuous and sequential occurrence of phenomena delimited by a beginning and an end.

The existence of time is based on periodic phenomena, which occur every certain period or its phases are all repeated permanently and regularly. To deny time is to deny the existence of periodic phenomena. The ticking of clocks is an example of a periodic phenomenon. You cannot deny the existence of time simply because neither the past nor the future is real.

KRONOS SYSTEM
Duration, time and eternity.
Eternity is the existence of something with no beginning or end.

Time is a subset of duration. Eternity is not subject to time.

I leave these three questions to ponder:
1- Does eternity exist?
2- Is eternity a purely religious concept?
3- Is matter eternal?

Last edited: Jul 26, 2020
11. river

Messages:
17,307
Sort off .

Yet affects matter ...​

12. river

Messages:
17,307

Hence the wave has physical properties .

13. river

Messages:
17,307
Seems the question is if "energy has mass? ( from post #65 ) .

Energy has always had mass , always .

14. AsexperiaValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,721
OUT OF TOPIC.

TROLL REPORTED.

Go to post #67 for new subject: WHY DOES TIME EXIST?

Last edited: Jul 26, 2020
15. river

Messages:
17,307
1- in what context ?

2- No.

3-Energy is eternal , hence matter is eternal . Both energy and matter are infinite in their existence . Nothing can never become , something ; Ever .

Last edited: Jul 26, 2020
16. Write4UValued Senior Member

Messages:
19,970
Asexperia said: :

I agree that time is a subset (measurement) of "duration".
I also agree that prior to the universe there existed a "timeless" (immeasurable) eternity.

Asexperia likes this.
17. river

Messages:
17,307

And duration is based on a physical objects internal properties and movements . Movement . And interactions with other physical objects .

" Nothing " in otherwords .

18. Write4UValued Senior Member

Messages:
19,970
IOW, the duration of any action as measured in increments of time. Note that time itself is not a physical thing.
Correct. Duration is a relative measurement of "Something", but is immeasurable of "Nothing".

That's why we started to "keep time" from the "beginning" of the Universe, not before.

19. river

Messages:
17,307
Break .....and brake . Write4U . Think . Think more about what your saying here .

20. Write4UValued Senior Member

Messages:
19,970
I have....

Can you be more specific?

21. river

Messages:
17,307
No you havn't

22. river

Messages:
17,307
None of this makes any sense .

23. Write4UValued Senior Member

Messages:
19,970
There is no measurable time before the beginning. The condition before the BB might have been a quantum instant or of infinite duration. It makes no difference. It is not accessible to our observation.

Before the BB was a truly different "dimension", (Bohmian Order) which via mathematical dynamics spawned our Universe.

Even if we could theorize the properties of such a dimension, we would not be able to establish the duration of existence, i.e. Time. You cannot measure Time with time, it yields a zero sum.