No the links should be provided by person claiming they exist...
You've misrepresented what I said. What I suggested was that maybe while you're waiting for me to find the time to present the link or links to which I was referring, you could do some actual research into the hypothesis rather than simply dismissing it because you don't like it.
...refute the six links and one video (all from very high quality sources) I gave.
Read for comprehension:
Right, so cooking allowed the growth in brain size driven by heat stress to occur. What's your point, precisely?
I'm not in the position of having to refute anything when what I'm proposing is compatable with your six links.
I don't have any way to know which two articles you referred to, even I were willing to search.
On the one hand,I've told you everything you need to know about one of them, on the other hand, you don't neccessarily need to refer to the two specific articles I was thinking of in order to do some background research into a hypothesis which to you is novel.
You clearly have nothing relevant to the discussion in your recent posts (1964 & 1962) which are only attacks on me - your unsupported claims that I "know nothing about it."
It's not unsupported, you yourself go on to support it in your very next sentence, and it's entirely relevant, you're dismissing the hypothesis out of hand, without doing any background research on it, without understanding it, and without understanding the role your 'objections' play in it.
I never claimed to know much - other than be aware of and quote what others highly regarded experts have said on the subject. With each of my 6 quotes in post 1751, there is of course the link, so you can read more. - I don't ask you to search for links and call you lazy for not doing so.
Right, and here
you are, attacking
me because I didn't provide the links you wanted on your time frame and you're too lazy to do your own background research.
News flash ass-hat.
1. I don't live in your time zone.
2. I work full time.
3. I have a wife with a disability.
4. I have two lovely children that I enjoy spending time with and prioritize over spoon-feeding people information they're too lazy to look for themselves.
All of which I have mentioned at various times in the back-room.
I provided you with the explanation as to why I wasn't in a position to provide you with the link you wanted right here in post #1961. Read for comprehension:
Because my schedule is totally the same as yours...
Which, again, I have mentioned in the backroom - essentially 'prime time US', that time when the majority of the posters are on, co-incides with my working day.
Now, it's 7.30am, typing this post has made me late for work, luckily, seeing as how I am at home, rather than at work - as I was yesterday when I posted on the matter, I have access to my bookmarks. Here is the arxic paper I was referring to:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5403
I think the other article I saw was on my facebook feed, and the chances of me finding it again are negligible, but I also have an inkling that it may have been in reference to this paper, but I can't be sure.