Entropy vs. Anti-Entropy (How DNA Defeats the Blackhole)

Hydrogen bonding, between water molecules, is not just polar, but can also be covalent. For example, during the pH effect, a hydrogen bonding hydrogen shifts into a covalent bond with another water to form H3O+ and OH-. The average H2O molecule in liquid water, only lasts about a millisecond, before it trades hydrogen; forms and breaks covalent bonds because the hydrogen bonding covalent state creates a bridge.

A hydrogen bond can be polar (a) or covalent (b), and can switch between these two states. The polar state needs to get as close as possible to minimize charge potential. But it can also work at less efficient distances for a weaker bond. The covalent hydrogen bond is not as flexible but rather has to be at the right angle and the right distance, so there is overlap of covalent bonding orbitals. The covalent hydrogen bond is more expanded than the polar; ice expands.

The net effect is the polar hydrogen bond, due to being more flexible, defines higher entropy. The covalent hydrogen bond, due to being so precise, has lower entropy. The water can adjust local entropy by switching hydrogen bonding states, while not having to break water structures. Although the structures will expand or collapse; covalent or polar dominance, respectively.

The internal energy levels of each hydrogen bonding state are sort of similar, with the covalent (b) state below more stable than the polar (a). There is a slight potential energy barrier between the two states, so each can be stable. But this hill is small enough to allow hydrogen bonds to shift back and forth between the two states.

Hydrogen bonding in water offers a binary switch, that can store and transmit real time information. It can transmit entropy, internal energy ,and can transmit or reflect changes in volume or pressure. If it forms the covalent state, the hydrogen bonds expand and will apply pressure. This pressure can lower the movement of enzymes, and inhibit their reactions, while being coordinated with other things.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Below is a diagram of information flow in water via hydrogen bonding. To this we add the flipping of the binary switch, changing the content of that information, to create equilibrium entanglement.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

The osmotic pressure wants to squish the hydrogen bonding of water. This implies the smaller polar state. The work due to the pressure supplies the energy for the potential energy barrier. Since the polar state has higher entropy, this moment is consistent with the entropy increase that drives the osmosis.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

So now instead of 'entaglement via entropy' you are saying 'equilibrium entanglement'.

I will yet again ask the question, "What do you mean by entanglement?" You have yet to answer, is the problem that you do not know what you mean? Did you use that term because it is just a sciency sounding word?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

To date the most promising structure yet discovered which displays some of the features and function consistent with those predicted by the instantiation hypothesis for the entanglement molecule (EM), while perhaps falling well shot of complete equivalence, is the Fenna-Matthews-Olson (FMO) complex. This photosynthetic antenna complex is the naturally occurring molecular structure responsible for the photosynthetic non-classical conduction observed in living plant cells via natural entanglement. In green algae it operates to overcome the otherwise inefficient latency of classical mechanisms which would result in a devastating loss of anti-entropic information needed from sunlight for the continued evolution of viable hosts on this planet.


Likewise, a similar natural entanglement antenna complex describes the predicted entanglement molecule which instantiate the living individual to available hosts wherever they may emerge in this universe. This Entanglement is between the living hosts (cells) and a form of matter (metamatter) in Hilbert-space made accessible only by the non-locality, non-relativistic reach of natural entanglement. It is indeed a true testament to the amazing ingenuity and flexibility of nature that such an implementation is not only possible, but naturally emerges, for life may not exist without it. This instantiation mechanism is the most plausible solution to the conundrum of individuality in this universe posed by the scenario of post (#89).


If the entanglement molecule indeed predated the cell then, structurally if not functionally, it must be of a different design than the FMO complex. The FMO is a protein based structure assembled from complex amino acids and likely evolved within the cell here on earth or planets nearby. To predate the cell the EM must permit natural entanglement by utilizing a more fundamental elemental design. The entanglement molecule may be one with which we are already familiar.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

So the most promising structure consistent with your Instant Conjecture, actually doesn't come close to supporting it.

So your point is you don't have any evidence what-so-ever for your fantasy? Uh, thanks for sharing that. [shrug]

 

At first the comprehension that ones’ first person individuality is abstracted, separate, and distinct from the evolution, development, and life of ones’ cells is a tough hurdle for the mind to overcome. Even as it is viewed from various perspectives, and in the absence of clarifying empirical evidence, it requires some time alone in contemplation and a steely objectivity to come to realize the truth of it. However humankind has had this problem before.


It is essential to recognize that maintaining life and maintaining an emerged individuality are both essential but separate functions of living hosts. The hosting of life via natural entanglement is an evolved property of inanimate matter whereas emerged individuality (Heterodyned by EC's) is an additional evolved skill of living multi-cellular organisms. The function of the entanglement cells (EC) in complex hosts is not to establish life in a multi-cellular organism. Each cell is already alive complements of the natural entanglement by its entanglement molecules (EM). Rather the role of the EC is to instantiate individuality, establish the position-of-view the target for experience of the emerged being. This unique composite natural entanglement with metamatter is separate and distinct from the natural entanglement established by each of the other (non-EC) living cells which comprise ones’ host body. Ergo; in nature you are not your body. This is why you can sever an entire leg or destroy a large portion of your brain , or drink beer and remain you. That is to say, maintain your individuality. This individuality is not about appearance or behavior or personality or intelligence or even consciousness, it is ones’ continued position–of-view via natural entanglement. You remain you because the emerged individual is separate and distinct from that of the trillions of non-EC cells that maintain its operation.

Each single cell which comprises your body is itself naturally entangled and is in nature a living individual, as is the emerged individual, you whose multi-cellular form and functions each non-EC cell help to maintain. This says nothing of your individuality. Further, this same implementation operates for leaves, trees, hair, internal organs etc. each are clearly multi-cellular and are alive but may only be collections of individualized living cells which are held together, and perhaps on some level, function together. Such an association of living individuals may or may not have evolved the capacity to heterodyne to establish a secondary emerged natural entanglement connection to metamatter. That is to say, they have not become an emerged individual like a beaver or a dolphin, human or an ant. Making a distinction between the position-of-view of a cell or a simple association of cells and the heterodyned composite POV of an emerged individual is a tenuous endeavor fraught with uncertainty absent the principles described in the instantiation hypothesis. In earth-life it is the hypothesized entanglement cells that are the evolutionary components of living hosts responsible for this advanced feature of emerged individuality. These terms and distinctions are necessary because our eyes and instruments deceive us; the largest life form in earth’s ecosystem the sequoia tree may very well not possess an emerged individuality whereas some of the smallest may.

Nature implements life by the same fundamental mechanism no matter the hosts form. In nature this sort of scalable, extensible implementation is the very definition of simplicity. It is the entanglement molecule that is hypothesized to fundamentally establish and maintain all life via natural entanglement in every living cell. One QE connection at some unique QEF is one individual. How this QE connection is established or maintained, composite or not, is irrelevant to natures design. Earth-life offers one (carbon based) approach to hosting nature’s implementation of life. Other planets may very well evolve other approaches. We may someday manufacture yet another. This implementation is what permits the universal mobility of individuality. Hosts for life and their constituent components whether single cellular or otherwise are local in space-time and have no natural universal mobility requiring physical travel (i.e. via comets or spacecraft).

 

Species Loyalty: Why should Mr. Zebra or any living individual seek to preserve its current species?


Every living entity possesses an entangled position-of-view. This axiom emerges from an understanding that nature must have only one implementation for life no matter what that entities visible appearance or structure or placement in space-time may be. This may eventually prove to be true only for earths’ particular genesis of life, but such an amendment would need to await our discovery of another unique genesis of life which demonstrates a non entanglement based implementation. Until then it remains prudent to assume that this natural entanglement is pervasive throughout nature. To the outside world each instantiation of any individual is a different unique instance of life, however to the individual, ones’ first person position of view is a singular and ongoing phenomenon of experience or the lack thereof, regardless of form or location of ones host. Persistent, retrievable memory spanning multiple instantiations is likely to be a very rare occurrence in living hosts. Nonetheless, nature provides a limited storage reserve of anti-entropic cellular state information imprinted in metamatter during the course of each instantiation, each lifetime. This information is accessible to any emerged hosts for life which utilizes natural entanglement to metamatter to instantiate a living being. It is hypothesized that the genesis of life in any ecosystem is bootstrapped by this universal cloud-storage reserve of anti-entropic cellular state information, and is made accessible by the entanglement molecule in a manner metaphorically similar to how a transceiver (ham-radio) may make information accessible to someone lost in the middle of a remote expansive desert. It is probable that the longer an individual’s lifespan the greater the influence of this stored imprint upon ones reinstantiation prospects is likely to be.


This may be the basis, the justification for species loyalty. Premise; is there any reason for any individual during any given instance of life to be loyal to ones current species besides a conscious immediate circumstantial need to survive? Many species demonstrate some partiality to their current species or host form. Why is this the case? Given that without the instantiation hypothesis most believe with varying degrees of certainty that ones’ current being will eventually cease to exist and this will be an eternal condition. However, the instantiation hypothesis mandates that there is a certainty of continued life, but not a certainty of form. Further, the instantiation hypothesis describes a mechanism which may influence ones reinstantiation prospects whereby the amount of imprinted familial metamatter in existence (entangled by family members with similar cellular DNA) positively biases ones prospects of reinstantiating into ones recent family line and thereby into ones recent species. How so? Cellular Natural entanglement is facilitated by any metamatter which is more similarly imprinted to the cellular state of the host cell(s) seeking entanglement. This is essentially a tuning relationship. Think of tuning a transistor radio to a specific electromagnetic frequency to receive a specific radio station which is broadcasting at that same frequency. Likewise a cells’ internal state which is largely dictated by its DNA and immediate circumstances is essentially a tuned entity.


So too is metamatter which has been imprinted over the course of a lifetime by cells of similar DNA and entanglement frequency (QEF). Compatible hosts and metamatter will therefore become more likely to engage in a natural entanglement relationship. Stem-metamatter is essentially un-imprinted metamatter and will therefore display no predisposition, or bias to entangle any specific host. In other words stem-metamatter will entangle any available viable host regardless of its form. If an individual’s metamatter is permitted to revert to a stem condition this suggests that this individual which has few or no compatible hosts in existence in the form of offspring or familial relations therefore has a statistically smaller probability of entangling a host from its former family line and an increasing probability of eventually (over time) entangling non-familial hosts in its former species. Further, with longer spans of time spent unentangled (dead, uninstantiated, not alive), this would increase the probability of entangling a host increasingly dissimilar to one’s previous host.


This natural implementation sheds some light on the demonstrated motivation of living individuals throughout earths ecosystem to procreate often at the expense of all else. Why should Mr. Zebra seek to preserve its current species? He isn’t really; Mr. Zebras’ DNA is in fact seeking to increase its chances of entangling similar metamatter by spreading copies of itself far and wide and in so doing it increases the individual’s, Mr. Zebras’ chances of reinstantiating into its current form. Any individual zebra or lion or ameba or human tends to subconsciously exercise this behavior even if it means eliminating any or most of its current species. On occasion this drive is seen to be partial to siblings and such but is largely self-serving. Seen from the outside, and in the absence of the understanding provided by the instantiation of life hypothesis, this behavior appears to be some sort of social loyalty of Mr. Zebra to zebras as a species, and is often described by a situational narrative or cognitive dedication to family and so forth. The truth is a more fundamental reality of natural cause and effect.

 

The only life on earth is the living cell. Pondering this inescapable fact with inflexible objectivity will eventually lead capable minds to profound revelations as one realizes that a single cell is, in nature, as alive and also equal not only to a human being but also to any other living form. If, for some reason of circumstance, no other living forms had emerged on earth besides the living cell, life in this universe would be no less present and real and lifes’ natural implementation in this universe would be no different than it is with the proliferation of host forms we see around us. This leads to yet another inescapable fact of life in this universe; In nature if each human being is an individual then so too is the single cell. Therefore in nature all forms of life are individual instances of life on earth, in this universe, and by extension everywhere in existence.


This latter point begs the question; in nature how then is individuality defined in the single living cell? How is it implemented in this vast relativistically constrained universe permeated by a Higgs field. where life may emerge in any viable environment. This latter point eliminates the biology and chemistry and technology of the physical component of the living individual as the defining property of uniqueness for each individual life. You are not your body. Interestingly enough, most of humankind throughout the ages, across many religions and belief systems correctly suspected this to be true. The problem has been to see that such an implementation could be and is a practical, real, eventually measurable implementation of natural law. Different from the science of lifes’ physical forms only in its unfamiliarity and its inaccessibility to our immediate senses and standard fair of instrumentation. However, with new insight comes new technology.



Proof, control and manipulation of the instantiation process is likely a far flung prospect for humankind which, as always, is more readily embraced by future instantiations of individuals who are exposed to these ideas from childhood as we were taught modern concepts of evolution and genetics which challenged our instantiations in centuries past. As always progress will no doubt require new flexible minds able to bridge the significant deficits in our understanding of many unfamiliar and hitherto unsettling aspects of life and of nature some we are yet to even imagine. So the difficulty some may have in seeing the mobility of individuality in this universe is perhaps as it must be,

 

The monogamy of entanglement is the law of nature that isolates an entangled state from intrusion by non participant, non indoctrinated entities. So how is it that the organelles in any given cell manage to share a common entangled state to the exclusion of other entities that may violate the cells wall? Isn’t the law of monogamy being violated? No, the law of monogamy isn’t being violated anymore than the law of gravity is being violated when we construct and fly 100 ton airliners carrying hundreds of passengers thru the atmosphere. As is always the case the laws of nature are never violated only manipulated and utilized to achieve a desired behavior. So it is in the living cell. To understand the living cells utilization of a common entangled state think of a cruise ship at sea, it either has an on board wireless communications transceiver (ham-radio etc.) or it doesn’t. A ship with such a device may allow its hundreds of crew members each in possession of their own hand units (talkies) to communicate with one another but also it permits the ship as an entity to communicate and share its state information with the cloud that is the outside world. In this scenario the crew shares a common channel of communication which is isolated from intrusion by some common degree-of-freedom defined by some uniquely quantifiable aspect of the electromagnetic spectrum. Usually that property is electromagnetic frequency modulation combined with a layer of encryption derived from a private encryption key for added security.


In the lab today we understand the promise of entanglement as a security encryption protocol primarily because of its monogamistic properties. We see that we may use the public and private key approach for encrypting and decrypting information securely. Likewise the cell utilizes a sort of private encryption key process to indoctrinate new entities manufactured within the cell from the cells own DNA to become participants, new organelles within the cell. This private key bestows upon newly minted entities a common shared degree-of-freedom defined by this individual cells’ specific quantum entanglement frequency (QEF). The QEF is a uniquely quantifiable aspect of the quantum entanglement spectrum. It is exposed only via the cells entanglement molecules which at this stage in evolution of earth-life have likely been fully incorporated within the molecular structure of the cell’s DNA.

It is through the utilization of the cells entanglement molecules that the individuals unique QEF is made available as a private key for the indoctrination of new cellular organelles. In our cruise ship analogy, consider a responsible crew member is tasked to program secure hand units (talkies) with the ships unique frequency and encryption key and then to distribute those units to each new member of the crew. This enables each new arrival to become a participating member of the ships staff thereby animating the ship as a self contained living organism. In the living cell it is hypothesized that a similar activity is undertaken when a ribosome manufactures a new protein line from its’ RNA and DNA within the cell’s nucleus. All new organelles are imbued with a common aspect of the entanglement spectrum. This property is exposed by the entanglement molecule within the cells’ DNA and permits the otherwise inanimate organelle to utilize the cellular natural entanglement connection to metamatter. In so doing the organelle is not entangled but like the crew members on the ship is in communion on some level with other cellular entities and also able to shares cellular state information with the universal cloud-storage of metamatter accessible by other naturally entangled host anywhere in this universe. No doubt today in the modern living cell this is a complicated process to describe and document but it is nonetheless recognizable through this analogy. This describes the natural implementation that is the predominant difference between a living entity and a non living one and the instantiation of the individual by natural entanglement.

 

This doesn't sound like a law of nature, this sounds like a law of random unrelated words.

They don't, except in your made up fantasy world.

Only if you are cheating on your spouse.
And the rest of you post is typical word salad not requiring a response.

 

It is quite clearly explained in this thread that the term QEF (Quantum Entanglement Frequency) is an abbreviation for a yet to be determined but specific degree-of-freedom (DOF) of the QE spectrum ergo (QEF). The concept of the role of the QEF in living hosts is hypothesized by, and is therefore unique to the instantiation hypothesis. For a discussion of DOF and their general role in state information transference or teleportation see the links below.

http://www.nature.co...ature14246.html
http://arxiv.org/ftp...9/1409.7769.pdf

If anyone is genuinely interested I recommend that you research Monogamy of Entanglement;

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0310037
http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.1867

 

Nothing you have tried to explain is clear or sensible. You appear to be little more than a random word generator.

 

When it comes to explanations of anything, increasing information entropy adds new buzz words, phrases and esoteric theory to create what appears to be a more even more complex and nebulous explanation. Anti-entropy information goes the other way and tries to reduce fancy buzz words and phrases, while bringing theory back to basics, so there is an increase clarity.

The physical analogy to this is osmosis. Pure water will freely diffuse, through a semi-permeable membrane in the direction of higher solute concentration in an attempt to randomize itself with the solute. This is the direction of increasing entropy and occurs spontaneously since it lowers potential.

With reverse osmosis, we need to add work and pressure to force the water backwards, through the membrane, into the direction of order and simplicity; structuring in water. Simplicity is closest to perfection because this is the direction of anti-entropic information, and requires mental work.

 

Oh look, it's random word generator #2.

 

Testable Element(s) of the Hypothesis:

post# 114: http://www.sciforums.com/threads/en...eats-the-blackhole.144448/page-6#post-3282496

This proposed test is one approach to identify and locate the subjects’ hypothesized entanglement cells via a systematic decremental process of targeted termination of candidate cells within the test subject (i.e. fruit flies, nematodes etc.), and thereby to finally terminate a healthy subject by destroying only the subjects’ entanglement cells, while inflicting no damage to the hosts’ non-EC cells, ergo death without damage.

Today all death known to modern science is eventually forensically caused by cellular damage to structures singularly or collectively vital to the host form. Such damage can invariably be determined to sufficiently disrupt conditions required for proper host function thereby resulting in the termination of the emerged individual, death. The instantiation hypothesis describes death as the disentanglement between ones entanglement cells (EC) with metamatter. This results in the loss of the individual’s position-of-view (POV). Today we see only the physical symptoms of the damage to the host and we quite adequately associate these conditions with the termination of the individual. This is fine for all that we currently do. However this is not the complete description of life in this universe.

If indeed it is the sole function of the hosts’ EC to maintain life of the emerged individual and if it falls upon all other cells of the host only to maintain the environmental, internal and or external conditions for the individual’s continued function then a few interesting insights may be posed.

1- Theoretically, terminating only an individual’s EC cells while leaving non-EC cells unaffected will result in the termination of the emerged individual while producing no damage to any system of the host, ergo death without damage.
2- Further, effectively transplanting an individual’s EC to another viable host will result in a successful exchange of an individual’s host form.
3- Identifying and isolating the EC will certainly aid in the identification of the hypothesized entanglement molecules.
4- Studying the entanglement molecule could lead to untold developments and technologies.

Some creatures on earth are evolved to terminate even healthy cells once other vital cells undergo necrosis, this is usually done by the release of a chemical death signal that moves through the rest of the healthy portions of the host and cause them to terminate. For creatures that do not possess this self-destruct feature, once the emerged being dies healthy or undamaged cells of the host may continue to live on. These occurrences suggest that the emerged individual is only linked to its other, non-EC, cells of the host by a dependency or reliance upon them to maintain vital conditions for continued life. Conditions such as the need for energy, and temperature and pressure and vital chemicals that may be required by the systems of the host form for continued function. Therefore, the function of every host for life is singularly dedicated to maintaining the internal and perhaps also the external environment for continued entanglement by the hosts EC thus maintaining the individuals POV. The POV being the composite QEF established and maintained by those same EC.

 

Doesn't seem very testable to me, unless you can identify the unevidenced entangled cells that you made up. How would you identify them?

 

The monogamy of entanglement enforces the integrity and isolation of an existing entangled state such as the hypothesized position-of-view (POV). It is in fact nature’s last line of defense against infiltration upon any entangled state. This effect can essentially be thought of as a self-destruct mechanism. The concept of defense by self destruction appears at times in implementations both technological and natural. In human affairs when vital information needs to be isolated or otherwise protected from infiltration at any cost we wire the asset for destruction with explosives or such. In nature the integrity of a law of conservation is often when such an effect is observed. In the case of an entangled state it is indeed when the conservation of information, one of nature’s fundamental laws, is threatened with violation is when the asset, the entangled relationship, forfeit. If one wired an asset to explode upon infiltration or upon specific violation then one would also need to broadcast this fact to interested parties for it to be an effective deterrent. Alternatively, one would need to erect obstacles of a defensive, offensive, and perhaps cognitive nature to actively keep out unwanted intrusions upon the protected asset. This is exactly what living hosts (species) are.

This evolutionary arms race to protect the individuals’ vital asset the POV began with a simple cell wall in the early proto-cell. This cell wall may be metaphorically compared to the posts of timber erected by early peoples that settled in a new land. They often erected a defensive barrier to keep out environmental threats and also to protect vital assets on the inside of the encampment. Today these walls have grown and evolved substantially both in nations and in the living cell. In the living cell and in any other host all systems are evolved to support in the protection of the POV the entangled state maintained by the entanglement molecules within the single cell. In complex (multi-cellular) hosts the POV is the entangled state maintained specifically by the entanglement cells (EC) which must be protected from intrusion or infiltration while sacrificing many other non-EC cells in due course.

Another apt metaphor for this idea is the starship enterprise on the popular iconic TV show star trek. Though the enterprise bristles with offensive as well as defensive and cognitive systems, both living and non-living, the last line of protection is to isolate or protect the information content inherent in the enterprise from infiltration. This is accomplished similarly by annihilating the ship. So it is that the well known self-destruct system of the enterprise is ushered into service at the last possible moment. Likewise the monogamy of entanglement as previously stated is nature’s last line of defense of the law of conservation of information in this universe. Make no mistake this is purely a cause and effect mechanism of natural law. Quantum coherence and its monogamistic properties are observations made in the laboratory and are given labels, names. No one should suggest at this juncture to know the fundamental underlying implementation in nature of these phenomena. However, plausible well considered hypothesis are welcome.

 

As intimidating as the idea may be; the only life on earth is the living cell in all of its forms. The aspect of being and individuality had by a single living cell is that which defines all life, no more and no less is required. This aspect which instantiates the first person being of a single cell as a living individual every bit as alive as any multi-cellular creature is the position-of-view (POV). All of the skills and talents that tend to distract from this fact are only emergent features of the host form. Beneath it all is ones’ POV. In this universe there isn’t one implementation of life for mammalian forms and another for insects and yet another for vegetation or microbial forms of life. Nature is an efficient system of cause and effect and life is one holistic effect.

The entanglement spectrum is part of nature. It is known to exist by modern science. It is being harnessed for use in technologies which may become available to you and I in the near future. However, long before that, perhaps even before the big-bang, nature has ‘used’ entanglement for, among other things, the implementation of individuality in living entities.

Think of it this way…Essentially, you have or own a part of the QE spectrum. This part, your QEF is all yours and it will always belong to you. Don’t panic this is not a mystical statement; it is a scientifically plausible premise. It is as if your individuality was defined by a unique band of FM-frequency on the electromagnetic spectrum (EMF). Any host (radio) that tuned in your EMF would instantiate you, that is to say, establish your being your position-of-view (POV) your presence as a solution of state in this space-time. Thereby tethering you to this particular host (radio/body). Dispense with any notion of personality, or behavior or memories or such of past instantiations (lives). These all extinguished along with any former hosts you may have had. The Monogamy of Entanglement is the property of the QE spectrum which maintains individuality. For interested readers I recommend that you research the general concept of; Monogamy of Entanglement;

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0310037
http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.1867


In nature it is the QE spectrum that assumes this role. Your QEF is an aspect or degree-of-freedom of the QE spectrum (similar to frequency) and is relativistically unconstrained (does not need comets or spacecraft to lumber through space-time) and implements your individuality in any viable form that emerges anywhere in this universe. This is essentially a form of coherent state information transference or natural teleportation see the links below for these general concepts.

http://www.nature.co...ature14246.html
http://arxiv.org/ftp...9/1409.7769.pdf

 

All matter is local . That is to say in this universe the three dimensions of space we experience enforce coordinates of position upon matter, a position enforced and mediated by a universal, simultaneous Higgs field. The other component of influence in our experience is the phenomenon we observe as change. Change in this universe is also universal, and simultaneous everywhere. It is only the individual’s observation of this ever present change that is not simultaneous. This latter attribute is why the laws of physics apply uniformly everywhere in this universe. It is why the value of the fine structure constant is seen to be so uniform throughout this universe. Humankind invented the concept of ‘time’ as a means of describing, measuring, and tracking this relentless, universal simultaneous change. Time is simply a proxy, a metric for this phenomenon of simultaneous change throughout the universe. Together this framework dictates the observed behavior of matter in this space-time. This behavior is local in that atoms emerge in some location and molecules emerge from these atoms in the same general (relativistically consistent) vicinity. The ever present Higgs field, via the laws of relativity, enforces a very real quantifiable limit of interaction between matter in this universe. There is no natural, classically understood means by which atoms, molecules, or matter with nonintersecting light cones may possibly interact. At least not until the emergence of the entanglement molecule.


With the emergence of the hypothesized entanglement molecule a new type of interaction for matter was introduced into this universe. For the first time corporeal, Higgs constrained molecules could share their defining degrees-of-freedom, their properties, their coherent states into a form of matter called metamatter. Metamatter manifests not in our three dimensions of space but in a space best described as Hilbert-space. If one chooses we may think of Hilbert-space simply as the forth physical dimension but of course this is a dramatic simplification. Hilbert-space to date, although a mathematical construct or tool, is thought to realistically host no fewer than 11 spacial dimensions. Nonetheless, metamatter because of its natural implementation outside of our space-time affords a non-local cloud-storage behavior upon regular matter based entities.


A metaphor for this entanglement relationship is human communication. The local manner in which human beings have been forced to communicate for centuries which has since been greatly enhanced by advanced wireless technologies that give us access to a cloud-storage infrastructure of the cell network and the internet. Similarly on earth the entanglement molecule emerged from locally congealed atoms which implemented natural entanglement to connect or share an information channel or state with this universal cloud-storage repository of metamatter. This unique capability marked the dawn of a new potential in this universe. It was at this pivotal moment that this universe changed from being an inanimate universe to become the living universe we see today. This would be so even in the absence of any emerged living hosts for life. At that point even if host forms for life had for some reason failed to emerge anywhere in this universe, with this implementation this universe should still be classified as a living universe. Make no mistake we should not consider the entanglement molecule to be a living entity but rather as the defining component of life. The irony is no doubt palpable in the distinction as we have grown so accustomed to seeing living forms or species as the very definition of life. Now for the first time an inanimate entity a primordial interstellar molecule is hypothesized to be the most fundamental physical component of life in this universe.


For the first time molecules of matter could engage and interact in a manner previously impossible in this universe. Molecules separated by distances great or small could now share internal informational states. These states are coherent degrees-of-freedom. Metamatter is akin to life’s dark-matter. It is as essential to life as interstellar dark-matter is to galaxy formation. Such cellular (host) states imprinted in metamatter are accessible to entanglement molecules elsewhere in this universe or perhaps in existence. This relationship is what defines your current being. It dictates your position not only in stellar or planetary terms but also in your current host form. It is what permits the mobility of your position of being in this universe and in nature.

 

Tony Lang,

If we live in a timeless (spaceless?) universe, what produces its illusion? What are the axes that actually exist if time is not one? Motion? Consciousness?

 

The theory of instantiation by natural entanglement proposes that all that you are experiencing at this moment including the body you’re in, and the reality you see as this universe, is a real-time rendering of a set of quantum wave functions of state (Hamiltonians) or qsf’s. These qsf’s comprise the metaverse, if you will, or Hilbert space if you won’t. They manifest a potential reality which for you, as an emerged composite being, would remain unresolved and inaccessible if not for your position-of-view (POV) produced and maintained by the entanglement molecules contained within a very special group of cells in your host form called the entanglement cells (EC). All living cells in or out of your body establish an entangled state with a form of matter called metamatter. However, most of your cells do not directly establish your emerged QE connection, your POV. It is only the EC’s that have evolved the specialization to heterodyne or combine their individual entangled state into a new unique composite entangled state to establish your individual LifeID at your unique QEF sufficiently different from that of your other cells. Together these elements establish your position-of-view (POV). The POV is the mathematical representation of the emerged individual. Each individual POV, regardless of the form taken by its host vessel, effectively provides a unique solution (practical and mathematical) which resolves, and collapses the surrounding ocean of qsf’s (Hamiltonians) that is nature, into that individuals’ reality. This collapse of quantum states into what we call reality is centered upon the individuals POV and manifests an individualized rendering of nature. Each individual rendering had by every truly living entity is similarly collapsed by those other POV’s. These realities are very similar at least for compatible POV’s such as those on earth and perhaps those that may be found throughout this universe.

Although not easy it is not impossible to detect differences between POV renderings as seen in individual observations of subtle quantum experiments (Double slit, weak-measurement etc.). Differences between individual POV’s and their resulting rendering of nature may have mostly to do with the cells that host the entanglement connection being that the QE spectrum upon which the POV is established is expected to be a significantly constant universal phenomenon. This is like saying that the audio experience produced by a radio set is primarily dependant upon the design and technology of the radio set given the same broadcast signal. In this metaphor ones’ natural entangled state is akin to the broadcast signal and your host form is the radio set. There may be many types of forms of radio sets and species but the fundamental natural implementation of both implementations, the natural entanglement spectrum and the electromagnetic spectrum, is universal.

One possible factor that may plausibly contribute to differences in POV rendering is likely to be the type of matter that comprise the host cells, or their equivalent, that is to say; normal matter as we know it versus some other form of (non-standard model) matter akin to dark-matter. Another factor is likely to be the unique degrees-of-freedom that may be indigenous to such exotic forms of matter may prove to be dominant in the description of the emerged POV’s wave functions (Hamiltonian) and interaction with nature. Liken the concept of a separate POV (which is not possible) to a CPU not yet connected to a motherboard, it is pure potential. Your position-of-view POV itself is not corporeal like a CPU but is instead essentially a standing quantum wave produced and maintained by your EC. The POV is the mathematical representation of the LifeID and both interferes and interacts and collapses natures own wave functions (Hamiltonians) which are the local superposition state of your environment (i.e. the cat is both dead and alive.) into the corporeal or particulate form your senses detect as your reality.

Ones senses, such as they’re configured in your particular host form, performs an entirely different task of rendering signals electromagnetically as telemetry gathered from this collapsed reality to form what we call experiences. Make no mistake, your position-of-view is not involved with such experiences but only serves to persist your placement as a solution of state in space-time. The collapse of the environments superposition state we call reality may not be solely or even largely performed by the living POV (arguably the electron plays a significant role in pre-rendering nature.) but nonetheless manifests the tangible physical position such experiences derives from. This is hypothesized to be the natural mechanism of ‘Being’ for every individual life-form that is implemented throughout this universe and indeed perhaps throughout existence. This is the root of the experience, or lack thereof, of life.