So, I web search "stoned retard" and I see this listed: Girls Are Retarded When They're Stoned.” - Springer Link Now, Springer, publishes text books. The references seem abundant. The abstract could be taken as a bit misogynistic, yet my mind wont allocate any notion of care; I feel it to be a waste of time to try any critique. In fact, reading the abstract lulls me into a conscious repose enough to want to get stoned and ponder haphazard publications out there. Like a paper entitled "In Euclidean space the distance between objects is proportionate to there positions" or, something something. Has anyone come across a paper that they remember, for lack of a better word, sheer flatness, or that could be used to spin in some kind of joke?
Maybe I should look for a paper about male to female peeing in the shower and how it relates to gender roles.
Apologies, I had a more political mindset at the time I posted. Was trolling elsewhere saying things like: "I'm gonna' start my own reality TV show. Like a cooking show where contestants are given a limited amount of time to prepare a meal with weird ingredients, but instead of a meal, my contestants will have to make an improvised explosive device." Trolling far right gun nuttery and wearing my absurd tint glasses. I sought out absurdity and came across this http://time.com/4026473/ridiculous-science-studies/ Then things got more interesting and I have less respect for TIME now. Especially when I came across this paragraph: https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2015/08/scientists-uncover-a-difference-between-the-sexes And so, since THC is a psychoactive drug, the paper referenced in the OP may have something, but I'm not that bored, and I'm still sure I could find something better to do other than read it.
I would still like to know, say a scientist was given $1 Million to study the effects of the colours red and blue on squirrels. With mountains of thorough research done. If such a paper would be published that had no practical use other than trying to think of some imaginative way it did, who would, and wouldn't publish?
Nobody and everybody, respectively. Unless the study found something headline-worthy, eg: Boys More likely to vote Republican..... yada, yada, yada ..... 61 of 100 male subjects responded positively to the colour red, while 72 of 100 female subjects responded positively to the colour blue.
Ah... German man calls police because he was being chased by baby squirrel https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...germany-rescue-orphan-karlsruhe-a8487026.html I didn't read past the headline. :EDIT: Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! But then I did.
