Write4U
Valued Senior Member
leopold,
i'm quite sure you will agree that the "impossible" happens.
???????????
leopold,
i'm quite sure you will agree that the "impossible" happens.
i find it next to impossible that there is a benevolent god out there full of love for humanity.
on the other hand, it's just as ludicrous to think atoms can self assemble themselves into a living, thinking, human being.
there must be a third option, there HAS to be.
an embryo comes from live.And how ludicrous then do you find an embryo can self-assemble itself into a living, thinking, human being? That you understand, but abiogenesis that is much simpler you can not believe. How come?
They don't. A layered system does (see below).it's just as ludicrous to think atoms can self assemble themselves into a living, thinking, human being.
It's not an option, it's a system. An organism is a system. It isn't limited to the laws of physics and chemistry. It's an organism so now the principles of biology apply. A zygote develops into an embryo under a very strict set of procedures. But none of them are described strictly be by chemistry and physics. They are described by biology. I think all of your concerns are suitable for a unit in a Biology class.there must be a third option, there HAS to be.
an embryo comes from live.
in the case of humans, sperm and ova.
these in turn also come from life.
abiogenesis is far from a simple matter.
an embryo comes from live.
in the case of humans, sperm and ova.
these in turn also come from life.
abiogenesis is far from a simple matter.
Both are opinions: the first is your opinion about your person philosophy of critical thinking.and?
the first is a fact.
the second, my opinion.
Now that is a matter of fact: by definition, the impossible does not happen.i'm quite sure you will agree that the "impossible" happens.
You didn't answer yes or no. You are still dodging the question, saying contradictory things that seem to imply no, but can still mean yes. So I'll ask again:mankind has been grappling with this question for centuries.
i find it next to impossible that there is a benevolent god out there full of love for humanity.
on the other hand, it's just as ludicrous to think atoms can self assemble themselves into a living, thinking, human being.
there must be a third option, there HAS to be.
That topic has its own thread now:
www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?142083-Free-Will-and-Determinism
Big Bang to abiogenesis to sentience to intelligence). And that kind of discussion is about as good as it gets.
i'm sure you did.You keep forgetting we created abiogenesis in the lab, it's very simple.
That's not how it works, you see, the sun, that big glowing yellow/white thing in the sky, about the same size as the moon, produces these things that scientists like to call 'light' and 'heat'. These heretical concepts mean that gasses in the solar system get driven out of the solar system unless they're gravitationally bound to something.
These two heretical concepts, heat and light, are also why Venus has no water left.
They formed in the same accretion disk, but they formed in a different part of the accretion disk which was at a different temperature. That's why they have a different bulk composition from the earth.
i'm sure you did.
i'm also sure it wasn't a continuous process from elements to the alleged "life"
So then, why there is no water on Mars?
yes, i visited the site you linked to.You are sure, but you haven't even looked at it, huh?!
actually the documentation, and especially a computer simulation, will be good enough.You are just as ignorant as Russty. At least see a video, or don't speak about it at all.
yes, i visited the site you linked to.
actually the documentation, and especially a computer simulation, will be good enough.
"Although a working version of a protocell has not yet been achieved in a laboratory setting, the goal appears well within reach."This site has better movies and nice summary of it all:
http://exploringorigins.org/nucleicacids.html
"Although a working version of a protocell has not yet been achieved in a laboratory setting, the goal appears well within reach."
after miller-urey demonstrated amino acids from primordial conditions, scientists were confident we would solve the origin of life within 10 years.
that was in 1953.
.
Quote Originally Posted by leopold View Post
after miller-urey demonstrated amino acids from primordial conditions, scientists were confident we would solve the origin of life within 10 years.
that was in 1953.