Galactic Magnetic field . And B.H.

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by river, Jul 26, 2020.

  1. river

    Messages:
    17,307

    Highlighted

    About that , I think its more about a break from my thoughts .
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    Thankfully, especially for the children.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Take the time that you need pad .
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    Agreed. I do spend to much time with you wallowing in the cesspit of ignorance. Still I like to help.
     
  8. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    LoL .!!!!
     
  9. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    So you're claiming that there's a "galactic magnetic field" that a black hole can "focus" by somehow "shrinking the matter" inside itself?

    Where is the focal point of the focussed field? What effects does the focussing have?

    Have you done the maths to verify your hypothesis?

    What is the source of the galactic magnetic field you mention? Does anything apart from black holes focus it? What measurable effects does that have? Who have done the relevant measurements? You?

    What causes the matter in the black hole to shrink when it focusses the galactic magnetic field? Please explain that mechanism for me.
     
  10. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    a few years ago i recal reading something about maybe Stephen Hawking & maybe someone else mentioning something about being unable to measure anything inside a black hole ?
     
  11. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    There's no way to get a message about any measurement made inside a black hole back to the outside world.

    What's the relevance of your comment to the part of my post you quoted?
     
  12. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    measuring a focused field
    theory verses mechanics

    regardless of a field existing or not existing being created by a black hole
    the ability to quantify it as being anything focused would be impossible
    only radiant(as you elude to)[i guess]
     
  13. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    The point is that BH's per se, are not magnetic and any electric field will quickly be neutralized. The magnetic fields will though exist in and from the surrounding accretion disks, spiraling into the BH, and at the polar jets we often see resulting from the spacetime vicinity outside the EH, and due to the frame dragging effect.

    And while James is correct that nothing inside a BH will ever be transferred to outside, we do have some reasonably deduced information due to compulsory collapse edict once any collapsing mass reaches the Schwarzchild limit of that mass.
    We can then logically assume that all the BH is, is critically curved spacetime, until the singularity at the core is reached...a singularity as defined by the failure of our known laws to prevail in that quantum/Planck vicinity.
     
  14. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    And we can logically assume that there is nonsense abound , from beginning to end , No need to highlight here .
     
  15. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    Logic and you are distant entities river...I have yet to see you employ it.
    My summation is of course correct, and can be supported. Your's are simply river's ignorant thoughts.
    Seeya, I choose not to debate with you, a known troll at this time
     
  16. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Seeya .

    The thread was started by me .
     
  17. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    Yep agreed and in kindergarten/nonsense sections

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  18. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Yet you are here spouting your opinion though .

    Why are you here in this thread pad ?

    Why bother , to your last statement .
     
  19. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    Wrong...I'm actually spouting scientific facts and theory
    Correct your nonsense river.
    So that people can understand [newbies and guests] that you are banned from the sciences and they should take what you say with a grain of salt.
     
  20. river

    Messages:
    17,307

    Which are out dated , and therefore wrong .
     
  21. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    No, more lies and denial. The current model of the universe stands unchallenged.
    You have nothing to support your nonsense...What you claim in your link is, is a non peer reviewed article, and still highly debatable.
    No mention of electric/Plasma universe whatsoever.....
    Please see
    "The Electric.Plasma Universe: A mixture of mysticism, pseudoscience and nonsense:" for detailed currently accepted knowledge based on the latest research.

    Off again river, just took the time to tidy up your predictable nonsense.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  22. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Your out dated pad .
     
  23. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543

Share This Page