This is the kind of thing that most health authorities do not want us to know: "After years of claims by the AIDS establishment that a link between HIV and immune supression had been established a High Court found the claim without merit and a unfounded deception. This is the first legal trail of the HUV/AIDS hypothesis and a historic defeat for AID$ Inc." http://www.la.indymedia.org/news/2003/06/66369.php
aids is the perfect tool for... eugenics.... that is population control.... and more importantly.. control of human breeding.... i.e.. who can and cant. aids... gives them the power to do so.. to implement eugenics.. with faulty tests... and make alot of money. -MT
And, I didn't read the link, but why would a judge be a good person to make a decision on scientific research? They are there to interpret law and apply it to cases...
Please get us alternative sources for the court's findings. The judge decided that teaching intelligent design in a science class was a breach of the constitutional separation of church and state.
Most of the people who die of AIDS receive no treatment. If AIDS is caused by the treatments used to combat HIV how is it that millions of HIV infected people around the world that receive not treatment, die of AIDS. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! This article is an outright lie. The German high court never sat to make judgment on the existence of HIV.
The Nation of Islam in the US believes HIV/AIDS was designed by white scientists and intended to depopulate Africa.Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
mod edit The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mary Robinson Article is from 2003. Mrs. Robinson's term of office expired in 2002. http://www.ohchr.org/english/about/hc/robinson.htm I can't find the article in the The United Nations Centre for Human Rights database. I can't find this court ruling anywhere but on AIDS denialist sites. Actually, there is nothing in the article that says the court ruled against HIV being the cause of AIDS. The article is misleading and irresponsible. I will move this topic to a more appropriate subforum.
Googling several phrases from the article produced between 10 and 11 results. I have only a layman's understanding of AIDS and am not qualified to say whether it's a myth or not, but this article is bullshit.
That is merely a matter of looking at the definition of 'science' and seeing if it applies to 'intelligent design' which it does not. It is also a very different matter. The judge was not making a scientific decision, but a legal one.
There are many thousands of reports of this on all sorts of Deutsche web sites: http://www.google.com/search?lr=lan...ll&num=48&as_q=AIDS 2001 Landgericht Dortmund
whatever, it's not biology. Try to dump it in WEP or ethics. and btw: Der Vorwurf des Petenten, die AIDS-Politik der Bundesregierung fördere die Tötung bestimmter Bevölkerungsgruppen, wird entschieden zurückgewiesen.
besides the fact, i know a Christian Scientist (this is a denomination of christianity) who died of AIDS, without taking medication. rather, he died of a flu. no miracle medication (christian scientists arent allowed) killed him, he was an intravenous drug user that played russian roulette one too many times. dont believe the hype.