Gravitational Fields and Gravitational Waves

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by TonyYuan, Mar 25, 2021.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Mohat Banned Banned

    Messages:
    66
    Hmm no ,

    G=F<E is a compete formula and explanation of gravitational transition .

    An object in motion whilst traveling through space will remain in motion because of the vector attractive force of the future position spatial points F<E .

    Any change of vector path requires an acting external force and/or a change of internal energy of the object .

    Quite clearly you know no physics but measures of physics .
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,227
    No, this is bullshit.
    No, this is bullshit.
    No, this is bullshit.

    And you're still a liar.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Mohat Banned Banned

    Messages:
    66
    You are quite the bot with a limited capacity for words .

    It is factual , not bs .

    Energy transition does not involve propulsion , thrust or ''emittence'' force , therefore the only answer left is transition by attractive force .

    You really should think before you keep embarrassing yourself with your limited thinking ability .
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,227
    It's funny isn't it that the cranks, liars and nutcases prefer to simply reiterate their unsupported claims and make personal attacks rather than actually support those claims.
     
  8. Mohat Banned Banned

    Messages:
    66
    It is a shame you do that , I have seen no support that you do physics so far !
     
  9. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,227
    And you haven't supported a single one of your contentions.
     
  10. Mohat Banned Banned

    Messages:
    66
    Axioms don't need support because they are self evidently true !
     
  11. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,351
    Seems I made the right call when I put Mohat on ignore.
     
    Dywyddyr likes this.
  12. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,227
    They're not axioms.
    And they can't be self-evidently true because they're blatantly bullshit.
     
  13. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,264
    Theorist.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. Mohat Banned Banned

    Messages:
    66
    Keep telling yourself that Victor Meldrew because the physics doesn't care if you don't bloody believe it in denial .

    Why don't you start by researching and looking up what a transition is ?

    Quite clearly you have no real interest in physics and your only purpose is to act to your feelings
     
  15. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,227
    You don't know what physics does or doesn't do, liar.
    Wrong again, liar.
     
  16. Mohat Banned Banned

    Messages:
    66
    All you ever say is blah blah blah , quite clearly you have been feeling down

    I suspect you are quite young ?
     
  17. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,227
    Not only a liar but stupid with it.
    My age is quite clearly given on my profile.
     
  18. Mohat Banned Banned

    Messages:
    66
    Ok if that is your age , you act like young with your mouth
     
  19. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,227
    I don't type with my mouth. Liar.
     
  20. Mohat Banned Banned

    Messages:
    66
    But you clearly are foul mouthed , remind a bit of that guy off TV who runs that pawn shop
     
  21. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,227
    But I don't lie about my occupation. So that's a plus.
     
  22. Mohat Banned Banned

    Messages:
    66
    I didn't lie about my occupation , I never stated my occupation . I said I was a professor of advanced science that doesn't mean I am employed by science .

    Anyway no worries , my feelings have not been touched by you
     
  23. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,227
    Um, professor IS an occupation. (In the UK).
    And that's a lie too.
    The title professor is reserved for those who have been promoted to the highest grade on the university pay scale.

    Like I asked before:
    WHERE are you a professor?
    Where did you get your qualifications?
    What have you published?
    Which institution made you a professor? (I actually know this one: you decided yourself that your title is "professor". Bit of a step up for a decorator, isn't it?)
    Oh I wasn't worried at all, liar.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page