Gravitational wave theory

It was either jcc or theorist-constant12345 who said exactly the same thing.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

[1] You post in the wrong forum.
[2] You disregard the answers you have been given
[3] If you had anything of substance [which you havn't] you would not be here.
You would obviously be undergoing proper peer review via the scientific method.
[4] You obviously have no qualifications and/or credentials to formulate or claim to have a better model than our current two.
[5] We have on this forum many alternative hypothesis pushers every day, all claiming to know better than the giants of the present and the past. and all suffering from delusions of grandeur.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Thats the thing our present model is " OK "

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

? Considering as far as I know, that we only need to use Newtonian mechanics for our space endeavours, that really says its, quite OK.....GR of course would give exactly the same results with slightly more unneeded refinement, and the added complicated maths involved.
Yep, it's OK, both OK.

 

Its not exact

 

How "exact" do you want it to be?

 

Exactly , exact

 

Essentially impossible - there will forever be some margin of error, even if it is a few nanometers, atoms, or billionths of a whole

 

Yet the exact must be investigated regardless

 

Did you read what I said?
The same results with unneeded refinement.
You see the word refinement? Good stuff!

 

Again, this is not possible with our level of technology. Case in point - to be truly "exact", we would have to know the position, direction, and velocity of the sub-atomic particles... this is impossible due to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

as well as the Observer Effect:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics)

 

For Galeleo I after the flyby the speed was 8.949 km/s but this was 0.00000392 km/s faster than expected.
For Galeleo II after the flyby the speed was 8.877 km/s but this was 0.0000046 km/s slower than expected.
There is an anomoly but that still seems pretty precise, doesn't it?
Do your think your conjecture (of course without any math [or logic]) can solve this mystery. I am thinking, not.

PS. I read some of your conjecture and there is a plethora of problems with it.

 

when a charge is vibrating, its em force follows. the charge emits em wave.

when a mass is vibrating, its gravitational force is vibrating, the mass emits gravitational wave.

when an atom vibrates at 10^14 or so per second, it emits visible light.

seems all correct?

 

Gravity and electromagnetism are two completely different forces.

I'm fairly certain this has been explained to you on more than one occasion.

 

there is only 1 force, i explained before. you just don't get it.

 

And your proof of this is...?

"Because I said so" isn't proof of anthing, by the way.

 

right here, theory of everything, http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=54194.0

get in and debunk if you able to.

 

You need to debunk the current theory before anybody has to bother debunking yours.

 

why don't you check my proof? did you asked for it?