Gravitomagnetism Versus Cern & Neutrinoflow, Disastrous?

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by Smellsniffsniff, Jul 5, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Smellsniffsniff Gravitomagnetism Heats the Sun Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    364
    Gravitomagnetism Versus Cern & Sun, Disastrous?

    If the gravitomagnetism in cern causes neutrinoes from the sun to hoop into extremely massive objects, they might fall back as a "neutrinoball" with no reason to do anything else then fall right back on earth.

    Is this in anyway possible?
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2010
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. darksidZz Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,924
    I have no idea what this means but it sounds as though it belongs in Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Smellsniffsniff Gravitomagnetism Heats the Sun Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    364
    Because it sounds like cern would be dangerous, would it effect the neutrinoflow?

    Neutrinoes comes from the sun in enourmous amounts. They have a really small gravity, but they have a really high speed. And a mass at speed is said to have a gravitomagnetical effect that decreases with the radius away from the matter not with r^2 but r.

    At relativistic speeds it becomes prevelent as compared to gravity.

    An opposite flow of matter would cause the neutrinoes to hoop into larger amounts.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    What makes you think that's possible?
    What "gravitomagnetism"?
     
  8. Smellsniffsniff Gravitomagnetism Heats the Sun Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    364
    Since you postulate that I understand the relation of mass and velocity any less then you, why don't you callibrate the difference between gravity and gravity perpendicular to the line of motion?

    I for one have callibrated both, and I know exactly the value of the gravitomagnetical force.
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2010
  9. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    That's not quite what I said.
    And what do you mean by "the relation of mass"?

    What does that have to do with my questions?

    Really?
    I doubt it...
     
  10. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    || Thread moved from "Free Thoughts" to "General Science & Technology".
     
  11. Smellsniffsniff Gravitomagnetism Heats the Sun Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    364
    I meant the relation of mass perpendicular to movement direction and speed, and that's all caused by the lack of words caused by unknown reason.
     
  12. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    And what exactly do you mean by the "relation of mass perpendicular to movement direction and speed"?

    I reiterate my original questions:
    What makes you think that's possible?
    What "gravitomagnetism"?

    Please answer these before continuing or diverting.
     
  13. Smellsniffsniff Gravitomagnetism Heats the Sun Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    364
    Here's one site:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitomagnetism

    However there are many.

    But what I'm refering to is that in speeds closing to c, the vector of gravity becomes horizontal to a high degree. Mass is also differently increasing in direction perpendicular to movement direction, according to my calcules.

    Point is explanations are many, but they all lead to the same goal. There is a force that decreases only by radius perpendicular to the movement direction, which is attractive at oppositely directed movements.
     
  14. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    You misunderstood my question:
    You asked if the "gravitomagentism in CERN" would cause effects.
    What "gravitomagnetism in CERN"?
    And you failed to read your sources:
    Where is the "massive rotating object" at CERN? Where is the "free falling object"?

    How can you tell in which direction the mass acts?
    Please post your "calculations".

    Link please.
     
  15. Smellsniffsniff Gravitomagnetism Heats the Sun Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    364
    The gravitomagnetical effect (gravity over z,y):

    3/(8^½)*m(1)m(2)/(r^2/(√(1 + v[2]/c)√(1+v[1]/c))*√(2(( 1 - (v[1](c + v[1])/c)^2)))√(2(( 1 - (v[2](c + v[2])/c)^2))))

    That's my own calculated effect.

    It took me quite some time to callibrate it.

    Basically, the effect is a gravity that only decreases by radius.

    With opposite directed speeds, it can be attractive.

    Google your own information, I get from my calcules that the force will be substancial, given speed in opposite movement direction.

    Might be errors, I'll edit when found and I feel urge and need
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2010
  16. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    And how have you verified this?
    What is m(1) and m(2)? What is z and y?

    As opposed to what? Where is gravity repulsive?

    Can you explain how this has not been noticed by CERN?
     
  17. Smellsniffsniff Gravitomagnetism Heats the Sun Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    364
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2010
  18. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Again:
    And how have you verified this?
    What is m(1) and m(2)? What is z and y?
    As opposed to what? Where is gravity repulsive?
    Can you explain how this has not been noticed by CERN?

    Simply posting (or linking) to an equation, especially one where you haven't defined the terms, proves nothing. Other than, of course, that you've written said equation down.
     
  19. Smellsniffsniff Gravitomagnetism Heats the Sun Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    364
    m(1) & m(2) are mass one and mass 2

    & infact, it only decrease by radius and not radius squared.

    That is the reason for many things, one of them is that the additional effect is not big small scale, it's big long scale.
     
  20. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Of which objects?

    Yet to be shown as factual.

    What do you mean by "big small scale" and "big long scale"?
     
  21. Smellsniffsniff Gravitomagnetism Heats the Sun Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    364
    I am saying that if m(1) = 1kg, m(2)= solar mass and v = c, and w = c

    & radius = c*360*8

    Then the force is G*(3/√8)*1*(solarmass)*4/(60*8)

    And that's much more you ever can pay.
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2010
  22. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    In other words you're making stuff up.
    How exactly does this "equation" relate to your contention about neutrinos at CERN?

    Again:
    And how have you verified this?
    What is z and y?
    As opposed to what? Where is gravity repulsive?
    Can you explain how this has not been noticed by CERN?
     
  23. Smellsniffsniff Gravitomagnetism Heats the Sun Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    364
    Putting the neutrinoes aside, the gravitomagnetical effect is extensive agains the suns particles, and the distance is c * time is c * 8 minutes, 60*8 seconds

    That is why the sun will get very hot if you do stuff in cern. I'm sorry, I believe this can be verified and.

    Earth can't pay for a supernovae, sorry.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page