I've referred directly to several - including Mann's famous hockey stick graph - that your claims deny (in that case, your claim of legitimate doubt regarding anything beyond the"logarithmic" direct effect of CO2 boosting, and that logarithmic effect trivial). But the fact that you cling to the irrelevancy of particular papers is proof of your denial: such silly chaff cannot persuade anyone honestly considering the matter. That's denial, that doubt. Just as doubting Hitler really killed lots of Jews is denial of the Holocaust. Just as doubting anyone flew airplanes full of people into the WTC buildings is denial of 9/11. So? Average temperatures exist now and at all times, equilibrium average temperatures will not exist for centuries if ever, equilibrium optimal average temperatures will never exist - it's a meaningless concept. And you are wrong. I posted evidence the first couple of times, it's a fairly well-discussed topic in the relevant communities, you have no excuse - you simply cannot abandon your ludicrous denial of AGW. There is no such thing. That is almost certainly true, and completely irrelevant. We are already dealing with a warming too large and too fast, and it's nowhere near over. That's what AGW is - a too large, too rapid warming, cause by a very large and very rapid boost in the greenhouse gas concentration of the atmosphere, primarily CO2 from fossil fuel combustion. There's no "if" - you are in denial. And that's not true, of the mass media - the mass media tend to exaggerate the good news, in the US - like the good side of the spreading of southeastern trees north and west in North America. You are wrong about the direction of pressure. That means your assumptions are wrong, or your logic is bad. I leave it to you to figure out which.