How did the Titanic break in half ?

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by Spencer666, Dec 27, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,311
    No.

    Was I overestimating your ability to type things into Google?
    And I have already sold mine and made a million dollars.
    That would align things horizontally, not vertically.
    So does Zefram Cochrane. He knows all sorts of things that are far beyond mainstream knowledge - and is actually more credible than you.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Spencer666 Registered Member

    Messages:
    167
    Your attempts to gain my knowledge by trying to bait me are futile . You obviously know nothing about physics or magnetic alignments .

    I very much doubt a Zefram Cochrane knows more than me about physics , I have the one and only accepted theory of everything .

    I additionally created 0 point energy and a free energy method .

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Never mind though , it doesn't concern you !

    P.s Isn't your friend out of star trek first contact
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Spencer666 Registered Member

    Messages:
    167
    You know nothing about physics , I suspect you are a bot and know nothing about formulas etc

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 71 years old Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,290
    Over to you DaveC426913

    I've been sprung as a bot

    You have the con

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    DaveC426913 likes this.
  8. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 71 years old Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,290
    Formula One is a race car race CLICK
    race car race CLICK
    race car race CLI

    Abort abort abo

    Werrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    exchemist likes this.
  9. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,174
    This is getting funnier and funnier: a classic madhouse, Theorist-type thread.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    wegs likes this.
  10. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 71 years old Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,290
    Yes of course. What was I thinking

    It's just that I know one of your company's was involved in the flight industry

    Did a bit more digging with Duck Duck Go

    One of your company's was involved in (invented) the tassles on the corners of flying carpets

    The forerunners of the upturned wing tips on modern aircraft

    Bet ol' 666 don't know that

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    exchemist likes this.
  11. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,174
    Brilliant, quite brilliant!

    Respect!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  12. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,206
    You contradict yourself.
     
  13. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,311
    Why would I need to bait you? I've already made my millions. And I don't really need any ideas from a guy who doesn't know how rockets work, or what freeboard is.
    You CAN use Google! Try to do a little more of that; you might learn something.
    That is apparent. And that one theory is the classic argument from incredulity. (You can use your newfound Google skills to look that one up.)
     
  14. Spencer666 Registered Member

    Messages:
    167
    Hmm, you wouldn't be on this forum if you had made millions !

    You can keep trying to bait me with your ''you don't know '' etc etc , it isn't going to work !

    Reverse psychology baiting !
     
  15. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,206
    The less you know, the more you think you know.
     
  16. Spencer666 Registered Member

    Messages:
    167
    I think it is becoming quite apparent that apart from the moderators on this forum , the rest of you ARE bored trolls who know no real science .
     
  17. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,264
    You're adorable.

     
  18. Spencer666 Registered Member

    Messages:
    167
    Do you think a rocket has the same amount of thrust power at altitude compared to ground level?

    The air is less dense the higher you get making thrust lose magnitude . That is why air density is important for lift off , it aides the lift by having something to push against other than the ground .

    Thrust in space has no medium to push against , the force is weak force , it is relativity .
     
  19. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,311
    Really? Fascinating you think that. What would I be doing, exactly?
    I don't think there's any baiting involved with listing all the things you don't know. You demonstrate your ignorance every time you post. Just go back and look at the tortured guesses you made - "A flat line is a horizontal plane" is "the golden key to ship building" - when you were trying to figure out how to say "freeboard." But because you have never sailed a ship in your life - or designed one, for that matter - you didn't know the terminology.

    I predict you'll make another two or three posts and continue to reveal your ignorance before you give up and go away for a few months. Then you'll return with yet another new name, hoping no one will realize that you are the same old, tired troll.
     
  20. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,311
    Nope. At altitude a rocket gives you MORE thrust for the same fuel. For example, the Space Shuttle Main Engine produces a specific impulse of 366 seconds at sea level; 452 seconds in a vacuum. You can look it up if you are capable. (I suspect you are not.)
    Nope. Relativity is a whole different subject you are ignorant of.
     
  21. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,264
    Rockets work more efficiently in vacuum than in atmo. Air interferes with a rocket's performance.

    Now, back to your bridge, you adorable troll.
     
  22. Spencer666 Registered Member

    Messages:
    167
    Are you saying a freeboard isn't a flat line ?

    Just because I don't use your terminology , a preference of my own terminology , that doesn't mean I don't know what I am talking about .

    If I had provided you a basic diagram to give with my terminology , you would see quite clearly that I know my physics .


    As I said

    A flat line
    A water line
    A submerged line


    Being the relevance of a ship based on a spirit level plane , gravitational relative of course !


    I really do have an unsinkable ship design , It is not my concerns that you do not believe me !
     
  23. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,863
    OK.

    What is this thread actually about. I don't know if it is a running gag.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page