Humans are still evolving

Have we stopped evolving? Whether the human race is still adapting to our surroundings is heavily debated – and now fresh genetic analyses by Harvard University’s Jonathan Beauchamp suggest we can control our surroundings, but it doesn't necessarily mean we're immune to natural selection..
Beauchamp compared genomes and traits of 20,000 older people with the number of children they’d produced, and found natural selection favours less schooling and a higher age of first menstruation.
He used a statistical test to analyse 20,000 Europe-descended Americans born between 1931 and 1953, part of the University of Michigan’s Health and Retirement Study. (They were chosen as their childbearing years were likely behind them.)
In terms of evolution, the more offspring a person has, the more times their genes can be passed on and the better their “evolutionary fitness”. When compared to the average brood for the population of their age, for instance, this is known as relative lifetime reproductive success.
He found people who had more kids – so were more evolutionarily fit – tended to have lower education levels, and the women were older at the time of their first menstruation.
But there are a number of limitations to the work, Beauchamp admits.

https://cosmosmagazine.com/biology/humans-are-still-evolving-study?

Study: http://www.pnas.org/content/113/28/7774

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

An interesting observation is there are more poor people in the world; blessed are the poor, than other economic groups. If we go by numbers, being poor has a connection to natural selection.

This makes sense since being poor does not allow one use social prosthesis to compensate for genetic deficiencies. This closer to how nature evolves life. Richness allows more access to social prosthesis to compensate for genetic deficiencies. This allows social advantage through artificial selection.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

How so?

What is a social prosthesis?

I am not sure what you mean, could you expound on this?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Yes evolving: Dominican republic Have one village were 1 of 9 male are born without pinus . I Brazil there are several families whose offspring have 6 functional fingers on each hand . In Turkey there is a family were the children walk on fore limbs. Called evolve or whatever.

 

I would call these birth defects. What is a pinus? Do you mean penis?

 

There are always variations in every species.
The human race would only evolve to have six fingers if it became ubitquious in an isolated population.

 

I was kept alive because of welfare. Well... employment inusrance - which allowed me to keep my home, and thus have children, evne when I didn't have work. Not necessarily something they have in third world countires.
I was kept alive because of an inhaler, which I had access to because I live in a First world country that provides such things.
We have all sorts of accessibility laws that enable the disabled to live normal, productive (reproductive) lives.

So, I am able to pass along my faulty genes better than someone who did not have access to such societal supports.

Yes, which we can correct or compensate for, leading to more likelihood of offspring.

I believe that is what he is saying.

 

Dick. Why defect they have I believe two or three generation born with out a dick and no testicles but the testicles or dick grow after puberty

Dick
I believe the village in the Dominican republic there are already in the third generation , and the Brazilian family in the second generation/ You want to call it error, good for you. By the way the boys which are born without a dick but with testicles and at the puberty age the dick started to grow. How about that for evolution.

 

Those boys have an inherited genetic condition, a lack of an enzyme that converts testosterone into another form. So this is a genetic variation, which, if beneficial, could become more widespread. Is it evolution? Technically, it's a change in allele frequency, so yes.

 

evolve or go extinct
whither hence?

 

One of the boys in Brazil of the families with six fingers on each hand he was actually proud, he said it was great for goalkeeper in soccer because his hands were larger. So here you are a benefit of mutation for soccer games/

 

Genetic mutations that become more common in the gene pool and examples of evolutionary changes. We also call them birth defects. You seem to assume that negative changes can't be evolution.

 

Would you call it devolution ?

 

No.

 

Devolution would be survival of the least fit to survive. Since the most able to survive do in fact survive, devolution makes no sense.

For instance if 5,000,000 years from now mankind has changed to a simian creature living in trees as family groups with no ability for language, that would still be an example of evolution.