I thought that the apparent increase in "distance" between the two lines came from the way that the lens of the magnifying glass bent the light.
That's why you did not discover the new particle.
I thought that the apparent increase in "distance" between the two lines came from the way that the lens of the magnifying glass bent the light.
Isn't Veegtron that stuff they spread on sandwiches in Australia?
Their side could do with some at the moment the way they're batting.Isn't Veegtron that stuff they spread on sandwiches in Australia?
this gets sillier with every post of victor's. It seems to be a young childs room. I wonder if it's his.
There is a particle that moves the airwaves of NASA in outer space. I've discovered that this particle is cold and is heated in the Solar System. For this reason, I say that I discovered a new particle in space.
I want your opinion and discussion to test my theory that there is a particle that is cold in space.
Very affectionately,
Víctor Elias Espinoza Guedez
Recommendation.
Make a study of the vibration of the space that surrounds the blades of a fan running.
@Victore --
I'm pretty sure that there are many, many sources of heat that you haven't taken into account in your "theory". I've already mentioned one, friction, but I'm positive we can think of many others.
I bet you you can't.