Dude, Really? So, specifically the "Abrahmaic God" can be disproven. I mean, that IS what you're saying, right? Yet, in the same post, you say that there is no definitive proof either way. You do realize that's total nonsense, right? You couldn't prove that the worship of an invisible three headed pig with wings who lives just outside of Alpha Centauri surrounded by incorporeal ex-playboy playmates is incorrect. Don't say you can disprove something you simply can't. You can infer to the end of the world, if you like, and claim reason and that a book is a hypocrite and whatever new and fun varieties of BS you have for why such a being,"Can't exist". You know me, Christian, but not super-fundy crazy or anything. If I'm willing to admit that the "abrahmic god" as described by most speakers for any religion involving it is wildly different from one describer to the next, why can't you simply admit that maybe there is such a being, poorly represented by many of it's followers, who either is quietly working things out as it wants, or who is sitting back and letting it all go on, perhaps to step in later? No, don't admit such a being must exist, because that's foolishness. Might exist. That's honest and fair. As for the pic, spidergoat: I know, terrifying that you thought me beheaded, yet still I live. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!