Impeach Xev? Serious Poll!

at least say s/he for Xev case, please. its piss some are our members off... they must have a little sand in their vaginas.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Jeez, I don't know, I'm no psychologist. But not too long ago on this forum, there was someone searching urgently for contact email or something declaring it was a emergency, but it turned out it was the same guy (he was pretending to be someone else searching for himself). There are lots of freaks out there.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Because I fuck his brains out every night.

But we are responding and corresponding with a username. None of you are actual people - you're just toys, the best of you are intelligent puppeteers.

 

just lovely!

you may think you're clever and funny, but I would think you would consider this matter, i.e. a vote on your impeachment as a moderator, a bit more seriously; and the vote thus far is very close. I know that this is not a binding vote, but there is a reason behind it, and that is because so many users complain of you.

 

Of course they complain of me - I'm profane and supercilious.
Why on earth would I take this seriously? Do you have any idea how many "I hate Xev" threads have been started?
I love it.
I get impeached, I get banned, I find some other way to waste my time. Fuck, I won't even be around for the summer so on the off chance y'all do "impeach" me, best do it now.

Have I mentioned that I'm an evil Nazi racist who eats the flesh of unbaptized babies?

 

But you are toys, a bunch of unknown teddy bears hammering away at some stupid keyboard, toys.

 

I strongly disagree with your opinion.

Xev, as a member, is tolerable, ignorable and entitled to her freedom of speech.

As a moderator, she has a job and a responsibility to members and the forum as a whole.

This type of response,

undermines the hard work other moderators do, and the most diffcult work of Porfiry in building and maintaining this forum. It's unacceptable for a moderator, and she should be summarily dismissed.

 

Too late James

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Originally posted by paulsamuel:

But she did not answer as a moderator, did she?
She answers as a memeber. Everybody has the right of free speech, even a moderator, just because she got a job to do does not mean that she should refrain from stating her opinions. As long as her opinions do not interfere with her moderating, I seriously do not care what she says.

 

again, i strongly disagree.

he obviously has no concern for his duties and no regard for the forum

why is he even a moderator?? he doesn't care at all. one would think that a moderator has some vested interest in making the forum a better place to be in. he has no regard for that whatever.

i say dump him

 

Again, do you think you're making a point by writing he?

It just makes you look stubborn.

 

Where would you get that idea from what I've written? I've never even accused Xev of being impolite.

Since he sought, then accepted, the position of moderator, his duty and responsibility is to moderate. This is a service both to members of the forum, but also to those responsible for maintaining the forum. By accepting the moderator position, he took on these responsibilities. If he doesn't want them, then he should resign.

Your statements are contradictory. To a certain extent, and by your own admission, he is a "parental figure" with responsibilities, i.e. "to ensure that the members play by the rules." Your statements are contradictory.

That is irrelevant. One doesn't need to be paid to have responsibilities to a position, e.g. little league coaches, well really any volunteer position. If one is not capable of handling the responsibilities, one does not and should not accept the position, whether that position was sought or thrust upon one.

I do not fail to realise that. I happen to disagree on 2 points. First, that his behavior is any different in the forum in which he "moderates," (and I'm using that term loosely). Second, that the behavioral constraints of moderators are lifted when moderators leave their forum.

I'm not sure why you think that other moderators don't have a problem with him. I'm not convinced that's true. I was asked to come here by a moderator, to submit my views.

That statement of his I quoted was an indication of how little he cares about SciForums and its members and what little regard he has for the position of moderator, in the very subforum where his fate on SciForums could be decided. So, it's obvious he doesn't take it seriously and is thumbing his nose at the other moderators, Porfiry, and all of us. That ought to give you such a big laugh that milk will come out of your nose.

 

Rappaccini:

'Cause he wants to suck my dick while I slap him around with a copy of "The Bell Curve".

Who's daddy's little slut, paula?

 

i can't wait until this poll closes and the thread is locked and over with...

 

perhaps Xev is a shemale, nasty

 

The Bells Curve... I did not know Paula gets turned on by works of fiction?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!