UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?

Maybe. But you leap to extraterrestrial too quickly.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I didn't say they were extraterrestrial. We don't know where they come from.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

That's what everybody is saying. We don't know what they are. It's the unevidenced speculation that people object to.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

So why is the title of the thread

IN DEFENCE OF SPACE ALIENS?

Why not In Defence of Middle Earth Aliens

or

In Defence of the Bottom of the Ocean Aliens

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

The thread was titled by James R when he split it off from another thread.

 

Fair enough

Was the reasoning because the wordings of the postings were

• specific in that regard? or they
• lead to that conclusion?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Ask James R. He's the one who thought it up..

 

I saw a triangular UFO not far from Belleville, Illinois. It resolved into a airplane's landing lights. I'm sure the folks at Belleville saw the same type of thing, but having a good story was more important to them than a mundane non-event.

 

You mean this?

http://www.nuforc.org/webreports/133/S133903.html

 

No.

 

How long now has MR known the title of this thread? And yet, MR continues to post in this thread.
Can anyone show me where JamesR is forcing MR to continually post in a thread titled ''In defence of space aliens.''
Does anyone think MR is too timid to start his own thread with an appropriate title for his kind of ''posts''?
MR is such a dickhead

 

Well, he's trolling. He got torn a new one a few years back. Words were said. Since then he's set out on a bloody-headed quest to see how much he can poke the bear and get away with it.

 

I'm simply presenting evidence and arguments for fringe phenomena without conceding any of the cliche talking points of the skeptical posters here. I've been doing it since 2011. If that is construed as trolling, that's your choice. Nothing I post is trolling. It's always consistent with the Fringe forum I am posting in: "They're among us."

 

No, it's spelled out explicitly in the rules:

Trolling':
I26. Evangelising is where the poster’s main aim is to spread the word about his or her beliefs, without being interested in real discussion or critical analysis.

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/sciforums-site-rules.142880/

As per JamesR's warning, you've been posting without bothering to engage in discussion, and have admitted you are either an opponent of - or possibly ignorant of - critical analysis.

 

Everybody who argues their points here in this forum can be construed as evangelizing. So that's a bullshit excuse to infract. And I have never backed down from an attempt to critically analyze my statements. I do however reserve the right not to respond to my posts being quoted out of context line by line. That is not how discussion is conducted and you know it.

 

Yes the rules are very clear... an thanks for helpin JamesR do his job.!!!

 

Dave is practicing to become a new moderator.

 

Pfft... ive been tryin for years wit little success... so what chance does Dave have... LOL.!!!

 

Yes you have. You have consistently refused to learn anything about human perception.

 

But, weren't you SS ?