Having a bad spelling day, just like that poster I was referring to? Notice I ended with to, not too. It was actually referring to your buddy, and his false charge of 'never link anything from a text-book, but simply wiki only' as per a post on p16 in: http://www.sciforums.com/threads/gravity-waves-detected-for-the-first-time-ever.154848/ Yet never once complained about your chronic use of and reliance on web references. Nice to have such selective and discrete buddies, huh. Decoded: You had not read it through nor grasped it's philosophy before posting. And think that 'validating length contraction' excuses the unnecessary baggage his approach introduces. As usual, ever so kind and gentle and understanding - toward yourself that is. Do carry on.