Is Nibiru confirmed to exist?

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Saint, Oct 25, 2016.

  1. river

    Messages:
    9,793
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,642
    I.e. BLANK.
    Sure... I wrote BS.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    And you've just admitted that you lied in posts #51 and #55.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
    What I see is someone who has been sucked into the woo and mystery of conspiracies, myths, hairy guys in the bush, Aliens conducting medical procedures etc, for so long now, that he just automatically jumps to whoever or whatever is pushing such nonsense, without much thinking.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,642
    I can't recall seeing evidence of him ever thinking.
     
  8. river

    Messages:
    9,793
    Irrelevant
     
  9. river

    Messages:
    9,793
    No info pad .
     
  10. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,642
    Hardly.
    I stated that the pages were blank - and you (contrary to prior claims) point out that "there is no info".
    What's the diff?
     
  11. river

    Messages:
    9,793
    Well neither do I find you can read .
     
  12. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
     
  13. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,642
    Right...
    Because I'm the one that posts links to NASA pages that are blank and claims there's info on them.
    I'm the one that says NASA has discovered Planet 9 when it's actually Caltech that claims to have done so.
    I'm the one that claims Planet 9 has been observed when in fact it hasn't.
    Oh, wait, that was all you.
     
    paddoboy likes this.
  14. river

    Messages:
    9,793
    IT Is a suggestion pad .

    But planet -9 on the NASA site gives no info , other than it's a giant planet .
     
  15. river

    Messages:
    9,793
    I looked up the NASA SITE , to find the info on planet -9

    It has been observed by NASA BUT NASA gives no info .

    Why is that ? why does NASA give no info on planet-9 , yet it confirms planet-9 existence ?

    Who knows ? but it is interesting why NASA doesn't .
     
  16. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
    No it hasn't.
    What can I say, other then repeat what I said to Dywyddyr in post 63.
     
  17. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
    http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/planetx
    "The possibility of a new planet is certainly an exciting one for me as a planetary scientist and for all of us," said Jim Green, director of NASA's Planetary Science Division.
    "This is not, however, the detection or discovery of a new planet. It's too early to say with certainty there's a so-called Planet X. What we're seeing is an early prediction based on modeling from limited observations.
     
  18. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,642
    Another lie.

    NASA does NOT "confirm" Planet 9's existence.

    What's more interesting is why you lie so much.
     
  19. river

    Messages:
    9,793
    What interested in why you can't handle the truth .

    What is Planet 9? | NASA
    www.nasa.gov/collection-asset/what-is-planet-9/
    Researchers have found evidence of a giant planet tracing a bizarre, highly elongated orbit in the outer solar system.
     
  20. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
  21. river

    Messages:
    9,793
    Ohhh.....BS pad .
     
  22. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,642
    One more time: that page is essentially blank:
    Jan. 22, 2016
    What is Planet 9?
    Last Updated: Jan. 25, 2016
    Editor: Brian Dunbar
    Tags: Kuiper Belt, Planets, Solar System

    It certainly doesn't contain anything like your purported quote. And, as Paddoboy pointed out "evidence[1] is NOT observation[2]".

    1 You've already been given a link that states quite clearly that the evidence is mathematical - NOT "observation".
    2 The evidence is not definitively confirmed.
     
  23. river

    Messages:
    9,793
    I see the same as pluto had evidence of its existence , and was later confirmed .
     

Share This Page