Well, from what i have seen so far of the results, i don't think i should spend any more time here. I guess i'm just a wack job.
There's no such thing as a pseudoscientist, there is only valid science and invalid science. I think most of what he says falls into the latter category.
science is that which uses proof on the most statistically probable and physically tested experiment that closely relates to the event/occurance
Wow, a lot can change over night. Someone here wants to fuck me, cuz i'm so hot.. i might take up that offer. Another thinks i'm not enough of a psuedoscientist, by their own standards. (One believes my ideas are the root of the 21st century....) To be fair, only half of the content of knowledge i own, are my own, and even they are rooted from the sceinstists before me. Someone wants me as a holla, whatever that might mean. If you know, just holla. Two believe i am the next Einstein another guy/garl think i am beyond their IQ. Four people believe i am in a top flat, watching the coocoo pass by... and a massive 7 believe in am simply a pseuedoscientist. ... ON FINAL reflections, let me just tell you, there will never be another Einstein, nor another me. By no class can one refer one to another, because we are unique in spectacular ways... It makes no sense to me, to believe an individual has the right or disingenious action to compare an individual next to another, because their is no such thing as a complete knowledge on a complex subject like physics, never mind a contest of knowledge. Let me state the obvious. Anyone who makes claims i am the next Einstein, or beyond it, are very wrong, but that's ok. We never often stop to think, ''Maybe Gareth, (whoever), will be a pioneer and maverik himself.'' That is how i would like to be known, when God rests me to sleep.
Oh wait. I see now. You don't know that everyone can see who voted for what - do you? So you voted for yourself as the next Einstein, without realising that everyone can see you voted for yourself. LOL. How embarrassing!
Yes, and you also voted 'Reiku is the next Einstein'. After all that spiel saying you can't be compared. You said: Why didn't you mention that one of them was you? That's so dishonest.
I disagree. I think pseudoscientist qualifies as a valid discipline. The methods or rules that comprise the "institution of pseudoscience" are usually pulled out of someone's ass, but they still qualify as methods and rules.
But i never voted twice. How is that possible, when the vote closes after the first??? Are you winding me up?
To me, psuedoscience, is still a science, just one that may not obey the rigor of normal thought processes. In fact, that's a type of evolution if you think about it. Did the huma race rally to logicality and sensical thoughts to get to where they are today? As i said, i am no Einstein, But..... Did you know Einstein for most of his early years was considered a psuedoscientist by his professors?
The poll is multiple choice. You ticked 2 boxes before clicking submit. You ticked 'Reiku...Reiku...Reiku...let's be less self centered here' and 'Reiku is the next Einstein'. Yes?
Obviously those who hold themselves in greater intelligence to distinguish such things.. ..or what that a rhetorical question John?
