Is this real maths or somebody winding me up?

[origin]

I have it explained it very simple, but ok if I need to explain my opinion even simpler.

You have not explained it simple. You have not explained anything that makes any sense!
This is a simple explanation:
Apples are red because the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Very simple but nonsense.

In one hand you have a light sphere that is a mono pole positive polarity, why can this sphere not exist?

Because a 'light sphere that is a mono pole positive polarity' is a made up term which is meaningless.
Did I win?

 

[amber]

I admire your persistence. But the only valid purpose in engaging someone like this is so that nonsense does not lie on the forum unchallenged. It's plain, from both this and past incarnations, that he can't learn. Another Walter Mitty, like Reiku but without the brains .

Here we go, if i have not learnt, how am I able to discuss matrix's and Cartesian coordinate systems ?

 

[amber]

You have not explained it simple. You have not explained anything that makes any sense!
This is a simple explanation:
Apples are red because the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Very simple but nonsense.

An electron is an electron only because of the proton, a proton is a proton only because of the electron. One cannot exist without the other.

 

[origin]

I admire your persistence. But the only valid purpose in engaging someone like this is so that nonsense does not lie on the forum unchallenged. It's plain, from both this and past incarnations, that he can't learn. Another Walter Mitty, like Reiku but without the brains .

Yeah this is nuts - I am running an experiment and this is how I am wasting my time until I get to a point that the parts are ready measure...

 

[amber]

Yeah this is nuts - I am running an experiment and this is how I am wasting my time until I get to a point that the parts are ready measure...

You have taught me quite a bit so it is hardly wasted time. what experiment are you doing?

 

[origin]

Here we go, if i have not learnt, how am I able to discuss matrix's and Cartesian coordinate systems ?

You are not discussing these things. You are using the terms but you are not stringing them together into meaningful sentences.

 

[origin]

An electron is an electron only because of the proton, a proton is a proton only because of the electron. One cannot exist without the other.

If you say so.

 

[origin]

You have taught me quite a bit so it is hardly wasted time. what experiment are you doing?

A drying experiment for ceramic product. I think I need to decrease the kinetic excitement... (I assume you meant translational kinetic energy).

 

[amber]

If you say so.

I don's say so, my matrix and the laws of Physics suggests so. It is an opinion based on information . Likewise polarities repulse is a fact, evident and proven. A matrix of only likewise polarity can not retain it's form without a mechanism to do so. What is true for (a) is also true for (b) in that either signed pole cannot individually retain form. However when both empty matrix's appear simultaneously at the same location point of space, both matrix's can retain form and exist.

 

[amber]

A drying experiment for ceramic product. I think I need to decrease the kinetic excitement... (I assume you meant translational kinetic energy).

I consider that when atoms interact with energy the consequence action is excitement in the form of they vibrate more?
An increase in friction creating the heat?

 

[amber]

A drying experiment for ceramic product. .

Dehumidifiers?

 

[origin]

I consider that when atoms interact with energy the consequence action is excitement in the form of they vibrate more?
An increase in friction creating the heat?

No. The temperature of an object is a measure of the translational kinetic energy of the atoms in the material. The vibrations do not make heat. The vibration IS the temperature. The transfer of vibrational energy from the higher temperature material to a lower temperature material is what we call heat.

And with that I am off to make my measurements and I can already see that the results are not what I desired. It was ever thus....

 

[Michael 345]

If you are so abstract that your statement is meaningless that is rather pointless.

Meaningless. How do you add positive and negative energy. What is negative energy?

What you have written is N + 2 electrons = the equation for the volume of a sphere.
Meaningless

You obvious don't understand that Captain America loves Wonder Woman not Supergirl and the formula explain how Wonder Woman's invisible jet gets its properties and as per Origin

That is like saying Tuesday plus a cat results in a velocity change...

Don't you just love psychoscience?

 

[amber]

No. The temperature of an object is a measure of the translational kinetic energy of the atoms in the material. The vibrations do not make heat. The vibration IS the temperature. The transfer of vibrational energy from the higher temperature material to a lower temperature material is what we call heat.

And with that I am off to make my measurements and I can already see that the results are not what I desired. It was ever thus....

There are many forms of kinetic energy - vibrational (the energy due to vibrational motion), rotational (the energy due to rotational motion), andtranslational (the energy due to motion from one location to another

 

[amber]

ƒ: a→b

ƒ: b→a

g:R³→R

Can you understand this?

I am watching Khan on matrix's and linear algebra, it seems over complicating , what is a transformation exactly?

 

[amber]

A=4*4

AAAA
AAAA
AAAA
AAAA

A1 top right

AT=transpose =

AAAA
AAAA
AAAA
AAAA

Have I just flipped Matrix A? A1 would now be bottom left?

ƒ: a→b transpose to ƒ: a.b mean anything?

 

[arfa brane]

T'was brillig, and the slithy toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe

 

[amber]

T'was brillig, and the slithy toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe

After a quick google search , I think you said it is nonsense, so back to the ''drawing board'' and maybe a different approach to my learning experience.

Input Matrix A

0000
0000
0000
0000

Input Matrix B

0000
0000
0000
0000


Output Matrix C


1111
1111
1111
1111

Do you understand this?

How about

df <- do.call(cbind, split(x, c("positive","negative")))?

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9508773/converting-one-column-of-data-into-two-columns-in-r?rq=1

 

[arfa brane]

I am watching Khan on matrix's and linear algebra, it seems over complicating , what is a transformation exactly?

Well, there might be some hope.

But you've been watching a video on matrices and linear algebra. Matrix algebra and linear algebra are kind of the same thing, at least in a Euclidean space.
In physics, every space has a Hilbert space associated with it, Hilbert spaces are more general than Euclidean spaces. And sure, there a a lot of programming languages that handle matrices and operations on them.
Try writing a program that can handle a permutation group (like for a deck of cards, say).

If you think linear algebra is complicated, try this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_space

 

[amber]

Well, there might be some hope.

But you've been watching a video on matrices and linear algebra. Matrix algebra and linear algebra are kind of the same thing, at least in a Euclidean space.
In physics, every space has a Hilbert space associated with it, Hilbert spaces are more general than Euclidean spaces. And sure, there a a lot of programming languages that handle matrices and operations on them.
Try writing a program that can handle a permutation group (like for a deck of cards, say).

If you think linear algebra is complicated, try this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_space

Thank you for your link , I had not heard of Hilbert space.

How do I describe an isotropic transformation (T) of an empty matrix (a) across an open space K , ?

T(a)=λa/K?

eigenvectors of a?

aX,Y,Z = λX,Y,Z

or

aX,Y,Z=λn?

or mapped

ƒ:a→n?

ƒ:[]→[n]?

n being n-dimensional