# James R: The S.A.M Issue

Discussion in 'Site Feedback' started by Gustav, Sep 7, 2009.

Not open for further replies.
1. ### GustavBannedBanned

Messages:
12,575

no worries, i question yours too
i like to think misguided but malicious is also on the table
for instance, the muslim titty pic in this thread
you allow it to stand in order to create an hostile and sexist environment for sam

3. ### BenTheManDr. of Physics, Prof. of LoveValued Senior Member

Messages:
8,967
Is it really S.A.M.'s job to show both sides of the argument?

5. ### pjdude1219The biscuit has risenValued Senior Member

Messages:
16,423
Its not her job to try and refute her own arguments. This is just excuses that your giving to refrain from cracking down on the rampent bigotry and propaganda of the pro-Israeli people.

7. ### (Q)Encephaloid MartiniValued Senior Member

Messages:
20,834
That would a be a lie, from someone else who doesn't think lying is a problem.

8. ### (Q)Encephaloid MartiniValued Senior Member

Messages:
20,834
Sam is the Islamic propagandist and the bigot here, but you make good bedfellows.

9. ### pjdude1219The biscuit has risenValued Senior Member

Messages:
16,423
I have never lied but than again anything that vindicates SAM must be lie

Messages:
12,575

thug #?

11. ### GeoffPCaput gerat lupinumValued Senior Member

Messages:
22,087
At best, pj, you could argue "some of". And you'd need examples.

Enough of the sweeping generalizations, please.

12. ### GustavBannedBanned

Messages:
12,575

perhaps you can expand on that a bit more. my conceptualization is probably gonna be stunted

how about the "competing hypotheses" angle?
if i favor one, can i not present that exclusively and leave others to come up with their own versions if they dispute my conclusion? is that not the entire purpose of this board? to have a discussion b/w various schools of thought?

i mean, sure i can touch on other hypotheses but if it really has no relevance to mine, why am i being forced to present it?

i see where james is coming from. he probably prefers a productive dialogue or none at all. however squashing the rhetoric put forth by the respective ideological divide simply means he allows the status quo to exists

the implications of that?

a possibility of genocide

Messages:
12,575

nice

14. ### GustavBannedBanned

Messages:
12,575
james's m.o

*he initially issued a statement
*subsequently attempted to defend his position
*failed so abandoned the defense entirely
*ignores most if not all requests and questions
*refers these back to the statement

in thru one ear, out, the other

15. ### draqonBannedBanned

Messages:
35,006
Gustav

*mocks administrator James R. thinking will get away with it
*starts this thread knowing of the war between SAM supporters and non-supporters as a result of it
*uses perky flashy cheesy weezy *is that a word?* punk as* colored text to get self noticed

in thru one scapegoat, out, the other

16. ### (Q)Encephaloid MartiniValued Senior Member

Messages:
20,834
Yes, that's what you and Sam keep stating, yet your posts demonstrate quite clearly that you are both lying.

But, then again, as a compulsive liar, you most likely will never admit to it.

17. ### (Q)Encephaloid MartiniValued Senior Member

Messages:
20,834
Just showing some intellectual honesty might be a good start. We can work our way up to arguments once Sam has an inkling to understanding that.

18. ### BenTheManDr. of Physics, Prof. of LoveValued Senior Member

Messages:
8,967
I doubt that James meant that people should present both sides of every argument when posting here---one need only look to the Formal Debates'' forum, where James has sparred with a number of different members. There is no need for a dialog if you present all sides of an argument.

I believe that the objection is not so much about the fact that S.A.M. presents only one side of the argument, but rather the way in which she goes about presenting her arguments. And to be sure, S.A.M. is not the only guilty party in this respect, although she is probably the most intelligent.

19. ### (Q)Encephaloid MartiniValued Senior Member

Messages:
20,834
True. She has a troupe of Islamic propagandists here and could easily be considered the "most intelligent" amongst them, but that doesn't say much at all, considering what we've seen so far.

Messages:
2,594
To Gustaf:

21. ### GustavBannedBanned

Messages:
12,575

you start off questioning and end up an apologetic

so there is a discordance b/w the actual rhetoric and practice?
shit like that is usually characterized as hypocrisy, yes?

22. ### (Q)Encephaloid MartiniValued Senior Member

Messages:
20,834
No worries, Sciforums is well known in the virtual world as 'Hypocriforums.'

Messages:
1,538