Discussion in 'Site Feedback' started by Gustav, Sep 7, 2009.
James already said no. James is above Tiassa, he has more power.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
So why is the discussion still going?
its just fuel to the flame. Make it burn! Inquisition! SAM Joan of Arc to the stake she goes! :bawl: Fr Tiassa Martin Ladvenu & Fr Isambart de la Bells behold the sciforums crucifix upon the muslim heresy!
When James R dissects a liberal leftwing anti-war criticism of the Obama government by an American as anti-American hate speech or propaganda, we are already in Hannity land. What could be curiouser than that?
These kind of threads are the real reason why people are leaving SciForums. It's tiresome.
If the mods decide to ban someone, or not, fucking do it already. Don't discuss it ad infinitum with the members.
Is this a great problem ? Or do you come here to discuss the moderators ?
Not for me, no. Only for those accusing anyone of having an opinion as being biased due to their political/religious orientation. What does it mean?
Well darling, wouldn't you not be a culprit in this crime scene? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Angel, say what you are doing here than. Speak to me.
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
What does what mean?
Why don't you tell the mods to ban you or shut up? If they are not willing to ban you they should stop accusing you.
I'm pointing out the inanity of this and similar threads. I'm not taking any sides as you might have noticed.
you are being rude and impolite. As a question has been raised by me of the action upon the accused, the answer was that the jury his highness James R. (bless his spirit and may he live long) decided in favor of SAM's presence upon this establishment.
Accusations here are not worth of banning they stem from the moderators disproving of SAM's constant focus upon Palestine vs. Israel conflict.
there is no middle ground. You are either on SAM's side or against her.
Rude and impolite?
What's rude and impolite is keeping SAM here so she can be criticized over and over. If what she does really is that bad they should ban her and move on, otherwise they should shut up about it.
I'm still waiting to see what the accusation is based on. So far we have explanation of a quote from a liberal American website branded as anti-American hate speech and a question on the WASP background of Americans as racist, anti-American, anti-Christian trolling that is still pending further analysis [maybe] . Then we have Bells chiming in with "threads asking us what we think about Jews" when referring to a single thread asking what people had learned from my threads on Jews and Israel and hints that "but after these last couple of weeks, you've lost me Do you know why? Because you lost my support when you started acting like a bigot yourself." based on such careless appraisal of my posts.
What exactly am I supposed to do when the mods are frivolous?
Really? Nice mindset.. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Also, you are hopelessly missing the point.
Stop discussing it with them and tell them to make up their mind already.
So you are giving moderators two choices/directives.
You...not a moderator in any slightest sense...a humble spirit of Sciforums...the working class so to speak, telling the Gods what and how to do?
Since they decided not to ban her, the only choice for them left is to "shut up about it" and Enmos Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! why dont you tell that to their face, Enmos. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Send a nice picturesque pm to each one saying how you want them to "shut up about it" Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I am sure they will take your middle ground stance.
SAM you are taking a side of Palestine, we all know it, mods know it, we know it, you know it.
In that war, both sides Palestine and Israel are both victims and an oppressor.
I am telling it to their faces. If they decided not to ban her they should stop participating in this kind of discussion.
Furthermore, I thought it was against the rules to start threads like this about members.
It makes no difference. After months of suggestions and discussion and questions [on my part as well as others] on "the problem of SAM as a moderaor", when actually push came to shove, it was the hecklers gallery that was most important.
Thats how sciforums works. Its "agenda" is determined by the hecklers. So "the problem of SAM" will be resolved the same way that "the problem of SAM as a moderator" was resolved.
With scant regard for anyone's opinion on the matter.
Separate names with a comma.