That's why I never argue against "concensus" theory, except for the concept of Time. But as that is a subject still under debate, my hope is that sometimes a different POV yielding the same result, could add some interesting aspects to the discussion. I know my limitations and would never presume to challenge established science. But Norbert is challenging established science, not only about the properties of Time, but also proposes a new set of mathematics to justify his hypothesis. Apparently he has not been able to formalize his theory into a mathematical equation that can be tested. So, there it is. There may "come a time" when this gets sorted out by more knowledge.