Yes, I noticed that too. A study of the origins of the automobile is not a study of automobiles themselves (or how they have "evolved"). This is explained by comments: WW's statement - quoted by above - thus becomes "In any "study" of the "origins of life"...". Which makes such a study - by definition - NOT part of evolutionary theory. (And also means that his argument, such as it is, is tautological: any study of X is the study of X).