low fertility rate

Discussion in 'Human Science' started by sculptor, Aug 8, 2020.

  1. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,476
    Is low fertility rate a cause for concern?
    As the population diminishes, is the fertility rate likely to increase, or continue to decline?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Jeeves Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,089
    If anything, it's a cause for celebration.
    The birth-rate doesn't actually indicate the degree of fertility in the population - only the number of conceptions. When a people has fewer babies, it usually means they're either starving (that's not true of Americans, yet) or controlling their reproduction. Control is a very good sign. It shows increased self-awareness, self-discipline, autonomy and foresight. If living conditions and the outlook for the future keep deteriorating, the birth-rate will go on declining; if conditions improve, it will rise.

    It also means that fewer children will be deprived of the necessities of life and opportunities to thrive.
    Any kids you don't have won't need to be caged by a future dictator.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,890
    What are you talking about? The world population is growing and is projected to continue to grow through 2100.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Jeeves Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,089
    I don't think Sculptor is concerned about a decline in world population.
    I think he's reacting to this recent news item .
    If this is a continuing trend, the US will fall ever farther behind in the population race and rely increasingly on immigration to supply the raw humanpower for everything from crop harvesting to riot policing to tax paying.
     
  8. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,476
    Jeeves:

    I had not seen that "news item" thanks for the link
     
  9. Jeeves Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,089
    If not that, than what did prompt your concern? In most newsworthy situations you hear about these days, the problem - the overwhelming, tragic, insurmountable problem - seems to be far too many people, never too few.
     
    parmalee likes this.
  10. parmalee peripatetic artisan Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,270
    Sculptor might be worried that he is going to live another 800 years, and will have to be cared for by immigrants during his declining decades.
     
    sideshowbob likes this.
  11. Jeeves Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,089
    Seriously, though, population is an increasingly urgent and pressing problem, with climate change and its concomitant wars and displacement. As the habitable Earth-surface shrinks and food supplies go into global decline or catastrophic collapse; as fresh water dries up and salt water rises, children will become an increasingly heavy burden. There are already far too many children being emotionally and socially crippled in refugee, migrant and containment camps - we're raising a generation of potentially rootless, truthless, futureless gangs.
    The lower classes of Europe and North America are simply following the example of their own middle class. If the women of the Other World follow suit in their turn, loosening the grip of patriarchal cultures, they might not have quite so horrible a time coming.
     
    RainbowSingularity likes this.
  12. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    fertility ability
    fertility rate
    birth rate
    infant mortality rate
    baby boomer birth rates
    food production techniques
    1 child policys
    infanticide
    cultural practice raping children for baby production

    you have a lot of reading to catch up on

    you may wish to narrow down your question to deliver an answer that you can understand
     
    sculptor likes this.
  13. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,538
    My guess would be different. He hoped, I think, to elicit a storm of indignant responses to what he thought was his incendiary comment about the population "declining", from the hand-wringing, milquetoast, pinko libtards he thinks infest the forum.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. Jeeves Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,089
    Yea, infesting is a lonely business!
     
  15. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    they have been raised as victims who obey absolute bloody power as a balance to solve their own fear which has been indoctrinated into their core personality

    on a different note
    western world fertility rates have crashed
    western world fertility rate crash has been masked by 2 major factors
    older birth
    declining population rate to a normalizing social cultural norm balanced against a longer life expectancy

    western couples are facing greater and greater difficulty conceiving children

    where as in the 3rd world, massive infant mortality rates where women give birth to 5 children and only 2 survive masks the massively disproportionate gap between conception rates birth rates and poverty driven infant mortality and health care

    eastern fertility rates have declined
    Asian fertility rates have dropped slightly
    African fertility rates are fairly even(except in high pollution zones)


    birth rates ... different subject
    infant mortality ... different subject
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2020
  16. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    yes


    yes
     
  17. Jeeves Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,089
    Is low fertility rate a cause for concern?
    Why? How many billions of humans do you want?
     
  18. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    lol

    there are several different discussions in there

    the base for my answer is the nature of quality of human reproduction

    "birth rate as a cultural law & moral ideology" is a different debate
    equally "work life wealth balance" & living wage income levels to poverty wealth ratios

    how many people are happy to live in high rise apartment ?
    hundreds of millions !

    how much land do humans need to grow food to feed the entire population ?
    they already have enough

    supply and demand is like saying "conspiracy theory"

    superseding issue is
    "how do you force birth control on populations when you cant control reproductive quality of human babies?"
    more soo ..
    when reproductive quality is declining globally
    how do you balance that against lack of value of human life which is paired with infant mortality and health care access


    pick a point to start and jump in

    personally i am happy with a decline in population due to the slow down of over population
    which would be equal to a global population decline in birth rate by around 15% to 20%
    equally a global decline in population by around 10% naturally
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2020
  19. Jeeves Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,089
    Yeah, if only 'naturally' were an option anymore!
    We missed that boat by three or four decades.
    The catastrophic extinction event hurtling down the turnpike won't be so nice.
     
  20. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447


    climate change including sea level rise ?

    interesting watching the latest reports from scientists about the ice melting(shelf's/glacial plugs)
    if there was one thing i wanted to be proved wrong about it was that !

    there will be no climate change agreements from the usa china or india
    they simply wont agree to anything to change
    Russia may agree in principal if other parties agree and will wait for others to join the debate

    Europe is now realizing it is acting way to slowly, but cant seem to change coarse
    their administration(EU & such like representatives making all the policy and voting) seems to be incapable of evolving
    they appear to be waiting for someone to waive a magic wand and instantly change them into a new machine
    they need to be doing all that heavy lifting themselves

    UK is likely to start some legal proceedings(making new climate orientated laws) soon which is good
    good for signals
    but they are only 1 player and they probably cant move their own machinery dynamically enough to process new legislation along with all the impending social change and brexit requirements
    dinosaurs watching speed skaters

    bricks n mortar ppffttt!
    climate change pppffftt !
    huh !

    they all need to be pushed
    covid is quite timely
    but there is still the stirring up the pot of selfish fat little schoolboys and then expecting them to become a dynamic charity organization
     

Share This Page