Reliable does not mean infallible. Vision is reliable for 99% of what we do. But it's not infallible. Neither is memory. And you still deny the very fact of pareidolia. You cannot possibly be sincerely in denial about so many critical aspects of paranormal research. Anyway, there's no point in going over this again. The difference between you and me is that I invoke established, well-documented science, whereas you regurgitate YouTube and GhostHunters TV.