# manipulating electrons and quarks to negate gravity

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Kevin paul wood, Jan 14, 2018.

1. ### Kevin paul woodRegistered Member

Messages:
32
i am currently attempting to use magnetic field resonance technonogy from circa1920 to negate gravitational force.The man who built coral castle Edward leedskeevin was using string theory and had no idea the forces at work! The truth he managed to slow an electron, for this thread lets say 99% enough to make time a factor for a hundred thousandth of a second as the field oscilated it pulled the quarks of the same polarity into its existance.so the proton and neutron werent there to give the atom mass and the 1% that was there in this version would only have 14% of its total gravitational drag, same as the philadelphia expeiriment,this is no lark i was the first to propose magnetic resonance having an effect on neutrinos and sci american did not publish it also the use of graphene to create the field now its accepted and a dr in china is getting 1000 t out of straind un even layer graphene

3. ### NotEinsteinValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,726
Do you mean that you are trying to produce a force, equal in strength but opposite in sign as gravity? Or do you mean you want to "remove the effect" that gravity has on an object?

How does one "pull quarks into existence" by slowing down an electron? And what polarity are you talking about?

Please explain how the protons and neutrons of an atom stop contributing to the mass of an atom by using magnetic fields.

I thought neutrino's didn't couple to photons?

Not sure what graphene has to do with this. Can you explain this connection more clearly, please?

Messages:
32

Messages:
32

8. ### Kevin paul woodRegistered Member

Messages:
32
hello sir for your first question the answer is i intend to make the matter not exist in a certain time by exciting an electron and also exiting the 3 quarks that make up the proton nd neutron of lets say a chunk of quartz, im not dead on the mechanics im in the material gathering phase of my expeirement.As i have the papers leedskeevin published though he said he took his secret to the grave i see string theory behind it all.in his work which then the only particle that was known was an electron he denotes the magnets strength as the lifting agent and seems to have found a way to encapsulate electrons into what he refferd to as a cage by using a 3 layerd em field and a fixed neodinium magnet as his 4th i have so many variables to contend with im afraid the way to do this is to quantify through example untill i can get the math of the forces as they coalesce into one.As for the last question that was my pet and i was scoffed at for the work but i willl post the equations momentarily​

9. ### NotEinsteinValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,726
If you make the matter not exist (i.e. disappear), there indeed is nothing for gravity to act upon. However, since you then have nothing (at least, you've destroyed the object), I don't see how this is useful.
I assume you meant to say that you make its mass not exist?

What about the virtual particles of the atom, and all the gluons that are also present? What about the binding energies that, through $E=mc^2$ also contribute to the mass?

I doubt he was talking about string theory. From what I can gather ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Leedskalnin#Magnetism ) his work probably even pre-dated Quantum Electro Dynamics, the most accurate theory created by scientists so far, which describes all known electric and magnetic effects.

Neodymium is a chemical element. A pure iron magnets contains none of it, so it cannot be the (sole) source of magnetism.

Good, those equations will probably clarify a thing or two.

Messages:
21,803

11. ### exchemistValued Senior Member

Messages:
7,715
Just as an aside for anyone interested, a so-called "neodymium magnet" is actually mostly iron! It is made from a "NIB" (neodymium-iron-boron) alloy, with the chemical formula Nb2Fe14B. More here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neodymium_magnet

12. ### NotEinsteinValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,726
I stand corrected.

Let's replace "iron" with "nickel" in my original post: "Neodymium is a chemical element. Pure nickel magnets contains none of it, so it cannot be the (sole) source of magnetism." Nickel is actually more fun in this case, because by heating it, you can apparently make these "cages by using a 3 layerd em field and a fixed neodinium magnet as his 4th" sort-of disappear.

13. ### Kevin paul woodRegistered Member

Messages:
32
im on to something sir and i appreciate alll the input i can get

14. ### James RJust this guy, you know?Staff Member

Messages:
32,036
Kevin,

I'm confused.

I don't think string theory existed at the time the coral castle was built.

Are you saying you believe he used string theory somehow to help him build it? What makes you think that? Is it just because you can't think of any other way he could have built it? Even assuming he did somehow know string theory, how exactly would that help him build it, anyway?

Erm... what?

What field are you talking about? What do you mean by pulling things into its existence? Why would slowing an electron make it oscillate? Why would an electron pull quarks of the same polarity? What kind of polarity are you talking about?

If you remove the protons and neutrons from an atom, there's no atom any more. Is there?

Do you think you can somehow reduce mass by using ... string theory? Or slowing electrons? Or something? Please explain how that works.

Are you saying the Philedelphia experiment used the same physics as the coral castle? What do you think happened in the Philedelphia experiment?

What effect do you think it has, and how exactly does it work?

What field? What kind of field are you talking about? Why is graphene important?

What does "1000 t" mean? Is that something to do with force? What has graphene got to do with negating gravity?

15. ### NotEinsteinValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,726
If I did, that was wrong of me, but I don't think I did that?

Exactly!

So he wasn't using string theory after all. OK.

OK.

Yes, I know you did. But I see now that I misinterpreted your sentence. You didn't mean all electrons are encapsulated; you meant that one can construct some kind of cage (trap) for them. Sorry about the confusion!

OK.

16. ### Kevin paul woodRegistered Member

Messages:
32
im not saying he knew string theory im saying thats the easiest way to understand the mechanics of what he was doing

Messages:
32

18. ### Kevin paul woodRegistered Member

Messages:
32
helllo i was unclear in my earlier posts 1 no leedskeevin did not know he was using string theory 2 the philadelphia expeiriment used electromagnetism to displace mass and sent a ship into another time. i know that string theory is tied to both just bc i know it is the only posible way to quantify both 3 what i was saying about the neutrinos 1000 t refers to a 1000 tesla magnetic field created by stressed uneven layerd graphene

Messages:
32

20. ### Kevin paul woodRegistered Member

Messages:
32
yes im saying that i intend to negate gravity using magnetics and excited electrons im convinced that there is a connection with leedskeevin tesla the bell and the philadelphia expieiriment it has to do with resonant frequency electrons and quarks what the nuts and bolts of this will be is making an electron which inside an atom is everywhere and nowhere at once be affected by time for a millisecond untill my fields oscilate then as it winks out of time it pulls the matter with the same polarity as it with it into nowhere causing a time mass hiccup it may sound crazy but people told me 3 yrs ago that i was crazy to think magnetic resonance had an effffect on the neutrino bombardment level in low orbit versus tertiary levels but its now commonly accepted anyhow i found this exciting

21. ### Kevin paul woodRegistered Member

Messages:
32
oh im a 7th grade dropout

22. ### Kevin paul woodRegistered Member

Messages:
32
please bear with me i love physics

23. ### originIn a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
10,676
Do you have a link explaining this. I don't know what you are talking about.

If you used punctuation your writing would be much easier to follow.