manipulating electrons and quarks to negate gravity

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Kevin paul wood, Jan 14, 2018.

  1. NotEinstein Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,500
    The current models of nature have four fundamental forces, including electromagnetism and gravity. This description precludes that one may negate the other. In other words, what you are proposing runs counter to all established physics.

    What are "resonant frequency electrons and quarks"?

    What does "winks out of time" mean?

    What is "matter with the same polarity"?

    What is a "time mass hiccup"?

    (See origin's response.)
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    31,445
    Kevin,

    Really? Why couldn't he have just used some ropes and chains and stuff to build the coral castle? How would string theory help?

    There's no known way electromagnetism can be used to send ships (or anything else) into another time. There's also no evidence that any ship was ever sent to another time, as far as I am aware.

    1000 Tesla is a huge field. Have you got a link to something that will tell me more about this?

    Can you explain your method, please?

    How will you actually do this, in practice?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
    the field is massive but the mechanics are twisting the band structure in bilayer graphene altering in plane fields and changing the pseudo spin winding by half thus changing the chiralities of quasiparticles that of spin one to spin one half sorry i havent been answering im suffering from a physical malady
     
  8. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
    no sense being obtuse he may have i may be wrong but im not very often
     
  9. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
     
  10. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
     
  11. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
    excellent quote and yes i have seen the real deal i was one of thousands who obsereved a massive object in 1995 traveling over southern il due to a moderate altitude difference i was closer to it than most i know im loosing you but the millitary claimed it
     
  12. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
    you are saying that i said they were exactly the same process i wouldnt say that bc im not sure but i have a 160 iq hunch they are at least 3rd cousins
     
  13. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
     
  14. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
     
  15. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
     
  16. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
    is it posible that my task will be acheivable by the actions of a solids electrons being manipulated to create pseudo entrophic quasiparticle entanglement that is changing rapidly enough to be the endrun around gravitaional pull?im getting closer i think, also it would be easy to start crystaline substances in a three way em field and sound waves as the tool to manipulate spooky reactionary effects be they what they may because of the electronic properties of crystal and sound wave substitution being new variables
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2018
  17. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,336
    Seems to me this joker has had a good run but it's time to get this crap out of the hard science section.
     
  18. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
    i got it, i know im right, leedskeevin did something in the magnetic field cage that no one has fallen on the magnetic cage as a resonance chamber of sorts for electrons as he used the 4 magnetic fields he exited the electrons in the stone which would make( the force )he spoke of these electrons were restricted from their spacial freedoms of no where, everywhere, no now ,no thenthes massless photons were highly energized the low end of his frequency spectrum he would bring the bozons close to the same hrtz as possible then the most powerful field would pul them together when it changed you have free range electrons which have been artificaly involved in quantum entangelment with the bozon and most of the electrons in said object went back to their usual spacial lawbreaking ways then he used pseudo quantum entangelment between electron andthe quintisental quasiparticle a bozon as the electrons are unrestricted and freed from ther spacial anomilies they circumvent gravity no laws broken time has power through mass and electrons to skate the very core particles of mass out and in to time and reality thanks to a bozo for making me think where i went wrong with everything
     
  19. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
    thank you now im on it
     
  20. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
     
  21. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,450
    So I guess you are trying to say you do not have a link to this claim?
     
  22. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
    i was wrong
     
  23. Kevin paul wood Registered Member

    Messages:
    32
    would someone lower themselves to tell me whats not feasable i know that the entangelment is between a particle and its self so thats why its suedo its entropic because it alows lower energy electrons to flow to it and the rest is basic i dont have a link this is a theory
     

Share This Page