Most of the murders in Chicago and though-out the USA, are done by those use a form of relative morality, as taught by atheism and liberalism. What most of these murderers believe and do, is not taught by any of the main religions. Christianity does not teach murder, stealing, extortion, addiction, etc. This is justified by the liberal and atheist philosophy, which states that morals are relative. How many of the gang bangers who find religion commit crime? How many who use relative morality commit crime? We would be better off not allowing atheists and liberals to enter the country, since they tend to commit most of the murder and crime. This is not publicized, since the liberal media is not under laws of morality. For example, 70% of the felons in the USA, register as Democrats. This party is a source of problems since it appeals to criminals. The leaders, set the example of corruption, that is justified and allowed. Harry Reid has got rich with land grab scams using his position of power, yet this is OK since it is relative morality. This could also explain why Obama will not label ISIS, as Muslim Extremist. Rather he tries to justify them as merged with Muslims. ISIS is a hybrid of relative morality and religion. Obama can relate to their crime side, while the religious merger allow him to perpetuates the atheist scape goat; religion. If ISIS was isolated as Muslim extremist, this will shines light on the relative morality side, that cheery picks for its own needs, instead of the overall schema of Muslim morality.