Mechanics of Gravity

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by jab, Nov 19, 2013.

  1. jab Registered Member

    Messages:
    1
    [/font]
     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2013
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. francescakat Registered Member

    Messages:
    62
    Without gravity on Earth life wouldn't exist.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,890
    Welcome to the forum.

    So if the aether is accelerated to some undefined level there is some sort of stress applied to the aether and it is converted to energy. What is the accleration, what are these stresses, why does the energy radiate away from the void? How does this not violate the conservation of mass and energy?

    Huh? If it is accelerating at twice the speed of light that means motionless aether will reach the speed of light in 0.5 seconds - and will stop accelerating?

    What led you to pick this particular value for the radius of a gravoid?

    That is based on the assumption that the radius of the gravoid has some physical meaning and was not just picked out of the air. A suspicious person might think you piced the radius of a gravoid to make these other numbers work out...



    You wrote
    \(E = mc^2 = \frac{c^2r^2}{(r_k)^2\)

    Which is strange because \(mc^2\) has the units of \(\frac{kg-m^2}{s^2}\)

    And \( \frac{c^2r^2}{(r_k)^2\) has the units of \(\frac{m^2}{s^2}\), which means they cannot be equal and your equation is not even energy.


    No that is not right. G has the units of \(\frac{m^3}{kg-s^2}\), not \(\frac{m}{s^2}\), nor is G "equal to the gravitational acceleration in the gravitational field of a 1 kilogram mass at a distance of 1 meter from center of mass".


    The rest of the paper fairs no better I am afraid.
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2013
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.

Share This Page